Orange County NC Website
Aside from the significant dollar increase in County current expense funding allocated to the <br /> school systems, the major difference between1986 and the current fiscal environment is funding <br /> for capital projects. From the late 1970s up to the 1988 bond referendum there were no concerns <br /> related to funding start up costs for new facilities. Capital Investment Programming was a new <br /> concept for Orange County government. This issue is significant because fund balance has been <br /> the major source of start up costs for new facilities for OCS. The CHCCS has used the district tax <br /> as a source for start up costs related to new facilities. This practice could also become an issue if <br /> the move toward funding equity gains momentum. The Finance Directors have identified three <br /> major issues related to fund balance policy that must be given consideration prior to setting and <br /> maintaining concrete fund balance targets. <br /> • Funding for Start up costs —As mentioned above, OCS has historically used fund balance <br /> as a source to pay the one time costs associated with opening new schools and the <br /> CHCCS has mainly used district taxes. If concrete fund balance targets are established <br /> and adhered to, an alternative source for start up costs would have to be identified for <br /> OCS. Likewise, if the district tax is frozen or reduced and/or eventually eliminated in the <br /> pursuit of equity funding, other funding sources would need to be identified. <br /> • Emergencies and Unforeseen Events— In addition to cash flow considerations, units of <br /> government also use fund balance to handle emergency situations and/or unforeseen <br /> events. If fund balance targets are established and followed, a clear statement should be <br /> made regarding response to emergencies or unforeseen events. <br /> • Use of Fund Balance for Operating Expenditures—This is another policy issue related to <br /> use of fund balance. Both school systems have used fund balance to pay for recurring <br /> operational initiatives in the past. The most recent example of this is the OCS use of$1.2 <br /> million in fund balance in their 2004-2005 budget to fund several operational initiatives. In <br /> addition, CHCCS appropriated $1.6 million. Use of fund balance to pay for ongoing <br /> operating costs could present funding challenges for these types of expenditures in future <br /> years as reserves become scarce (note the last full paragraph in Superintendent <br /> Carraway's September 22, 2004 memo on school fund balance). A sound fund balance <br /> policy should also address when and under what circumstances fund balance should be <br /> considered for funding ongoing operational expenditures <br /> As mentioned above, the 1986 memo from Gordon Baker that resulted in the current policy only <br /> addressed fund balance as a cash flow tool, The Finance Directors agreed that a sound fund <br /> balance policy should be more comprehensive and include not only percentage targets related to <br /> the levels required to meet cash flow needs, but also address issues involving the how and when it <br /> can be accumulated and used. <br />