Orange County NC Website
filfltl;hlL.ilt ~'. t <br />accommodate forecast growth in student membership. The membership numbers reflect an <br />actual student count as defined in the MOU. The capacity that is noted is from last year's <br />SAPFOTAC cer"tification- <br />The SAPFOTAC analytical work would normally take place In the January-February fimeframe, <br />but was accelerated for 2004-05 at the request of the BOCC because the results of the <br />SAPFOTAC analysis of updated student membership projections will have a significant impact <br />on major capital funding decisions that the BOCC will need to make in the very near future. <br />SAPFOTAC is tasked So produce an annual report for the governing boards of each SAPFO <br />partner. The full annual SAPFOTAC report will be completed in early 2005. <br />Building Capacity <br />There has been extensive discussion among the governing boards and staff of the County and <br />school systems throughout 2004 regarding the certification of individual school building <br />capacities, The State of North Carolina has taken unilateral action during the past rivo years to <br />dictate to local school administrative units that the average class size throughout a school <br />district for grades K-3 must be reduced to 1 teacher for every 21 students. As the BOCC has <br />noted, this has in effect created an unfunded mandate for county governments to provide <br />additional school space v/ith no time to plan for the funding and construction of new space. <br />Foilovring discussion on the subject at a November 2004 work session, the County Attorney <br />examined the requirements for reduced class size and the possible sanctions or other <br />ramfficaGons that might face any school system that is unable to comply with the average class <br />size mandates, The accompanying letter from the Attorney outlines the results of his research. <br />As provided for in the SAPFO Section t.b ".....'building capacity' will be determined... by a joint <br />action of the School Board and the BOCC." Therefore, until there is a 'joint action' agreeing to <br />fhe impact of ne~v State rules for classroom size in grades K-3, the existing capacity levels are <br />being used for capacity/membership projection comparisons. <br />Implications of Updated Ten Year Student Membership Projections <br />SAPFO provides that the County must provide funding and a school system must construct new <br />school space so that the level of Service (LOS} for elementary school space will not exceed <br />i05% of capacity across an entire school district. The updated ten-year student membership <br />projections prepared by SAPFOTAC and reflected on the accompanying charts indicate that, <br />absent the creation of new seats, the 105% level of service would be exceeded at the <br />elementary level in the Chapel Hill-Carrboro City Schools for academia year 2009-10. <br />Accordingly, adherence to SAPFO provisions vrill require that new permanent elementary <br />school space be available for the beginning of that school year. The Headed opening date has <br />shifted back three years compared to the 2000-07 opening contemplated in last year's student <br />membership projections.. Slowing growth produced only minor enrollment increases at the <br />elementary level in the Chapel Hili-Carrboro Schools during the currenf schoai year. <br />CHCCS Middle School #5 is projected to be needed in 2013-2014.. B00 new seats will become <br />available vrith the anticipated opening of CHCCS High School #3 in August 2007. Based on fhe <br />updated student membership projections, there is no other additional high school space Headed <br />~viihin the tan-year planning period. <br />G3 <br />_. <br />