Orange County NC Website
25 <br /> 1 advisory boards (which our policy currently states but that only includes other <br /> 2 Orange County advisory boards) and including within this parameter for two <br /> 3 boards — both Orange County and/or municipal boards. <br /> 4 <br /> 5 Chair Dorosin said this gets to the heart of the "closed circle" that participates in <br /> 6 boards/commissions. <br /> 7 Commissioner Price clarified that this would limit one from being on Orange County <br /> 8 Planning Board, Chapel Hill Planning Board and OWASA all at the same time, for example. <br /> 9 Chair Dorosin said yes. He said the current policy states that one can only serve on 2 <br /> 10 Orange County boards, and this would limit service to one Orange County board and one other <br /> 11 board. <br /> 12 Donna Baker said in order to accomplish this staff could add another question to <br /> 13 application as to which boards an applicant is currently serving on outside of Orange County <br /> 14 boards. <br /> 15 Commissioner McKee said he is not in favor of this change as the BOCC already has <br /> 16 the authority to accept or reject any applicant to its boards/commissions. <br /> 17 Commissioner Price said one can serve on two County boards as well as one task force. <br /> 18 Commissioner Rich said it is important to know where other people are serving from an <br /> 19 informational standpoint, and perhaps a policy is unnecessary, but she would like to know the <br /> 20 information. <br /> 21 Commissioner McKee said he questions how often this is really happening, and doubts <br /> 22 it is happening enough to warrant a policy. He said he is fundamentally against layer upon <br /> 23 layer of bureaucracy. He said the BOCC is not swamped by applications for these boards or <br /> 24 commissions. <br /> 25 Chair Dorosin said the BOCC sees the same names over and over again. <br /> 26 Commissioner McKee said that happens everywhere: churches, fire departments, town <br /> 27 councils, etc. He questions why the BOCC would add layers to this process, as it seems to be <br /> 28 like killing a fly with a shotgun. <br /> 29 Commissioner Marcoplos said he basically agreed with Commissioner McKee, and <br /> 30 would rather just take it on a case-by-case basis. He said if one is worming their way onto <br /> 31 multiple boards, then the BOCC would not appoint them to another; but if one is serving on two <br /> 32 boards, but has a unique talent or knowledge to make them appropriate for another board, he <br /> 33 would be in favor of that person's appointment. He said no one wants to see the same people <br /> 34 hogging all the positions on powerful committees, but there is also a desire to fill the gaps with <br /> 35 people who can best serve. <br /> 36 Chair Dorosin said perhaps it makes sense to simply add the question to the application. <br /> 37 Thom Freeman said it is a bit of a moving target. He said the question can be added to <br /> 38 the initial application, but over time the answer to that question may change. He said it is hard <br /> 39 to monitor. <br /> 40 Commissioner Price asked if staff was checking into the accuracy of an application prior <br /> 41 to an appointment being placed on BOCC agenda. <br /> 42 Thom Freeman said if an application is 6-12 months old, he checks to see if the <br /> 43 applicant is still interested. He also asks for updates, and can add in this question about <br /> 44 service on other boards. <br /> 45 Commissioner Price said to add a box or line to application. <br /> 46 Chair Dorosin said there is consensus to add the question of whether one serves on <br /> 47 other boards to the application. <br /> 48 <br /> 49 5. Discussion/Decision Point: <br />