Browse
Search
Agenda - 08-23-2004-D
OrangeCountyNC
>
Board of County Commissioners
>
BOCC Agendas
>
2000's
>
2004
>
Agenda - 08-23-2004
>
Agenda - 08-23-2004-D
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/29/2008 4:19:58 PM
Creation date
8/29/2008 10:23:41 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
BOCC
Date
8/23/2004
Document Type
Agenda
Agenda Item
D
Document Relationships
Minutes - 20040823
(Linked To)
Path:
\Board of County Commissioners\Minutes - Approved\2000's\2004
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
6
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Lessons Learned <br />General Information <br />The Zoning Ordinance does not allow signs, other than governmental signs, in <br />the public right-of-way. A basic, fact, although confusing to many people, is that a <br />public right-of-way is variable because it is specific to each property. It may be <br />60+ feet in width atone place and perhaps no recorded right-of-way at all in other <br />places, nearby, on the same road. <br />Unless the right-of-way is clearly identified with surveyed markers, the NCDOT <br />will generally maintain from back of ditch to back of ditch, which may be only a <br />portion of the actual right-of-way. The NCDOT 'claims' the right-of-way for <br />maintenance purposes only. <br />In areas with sidewalks, signs are usually not allowed between the sidewalk and <br />the paved surfaces of the roadway. Because roadways with sidewalks tend to be <br />newer, the right-of-way widths are usually designated during the final platting of <br />the property. In other cases, the acquisition of enough right-of-way prior to <br />installing sidewalks occurs prior to construction.. <br />Enforcement <br />During the Planning Department's recent enforcement of improperly placed <br />political signs we noticed numerous signs at the edge of the street pavement and <br />even more obscuring sight visibility at intersections. Both of these locations <br />present safety hazards. Given the virtual impossibility of determining actual right- <br />of-way in the field, staff relied upon the NCDOT method of interpreting right-of- <br />way as being back of ditch to back of ditch. Any signs behind the ditch lines <br />were okay provided the sight distance triangles were kept clear. <br />The Zoning Ordinance does not state who is to remove signs that are placed in <br />the right-of-way in violation of the ordinance, That responsibility has in the past <br />fallen to the Planning Department as is the case in many other jurisdictions. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.