Browse
Search
Agenda - 08-23-2004-C
OrangeCountyNC
>
Board of County Commissioners
>
BOCC Agendas
>
2000's
>
2004
>
Agenda - 08-23-2004
>
Agenda - 08-23-2004-C
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
4/22/2013 4:14:35 PM
Creation date
8/29/2008 10:23:39 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
BOCC
Date
8/23/2004
Document Type
Agenda
Agenda Item
C
Document Relationships
Minutes - 20040823
(Linked To)
Path:
\Board of County Commissioners\Minutes - Approved\2000's\2004
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
42
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Z3 <br />IL Outreach Process <br />vi) Minimum Lot Size <br />(1) Does the methodology used in the Water Resources Report, which <br />supports a countywide 2 -ac minimum lot size average, take groundwater <br />recharge from septic fields into consideration? (Hills) <br />(2) Will larger lots decrease land value? How will this affect property- owners <br />who depend on the equity in their land? (CG) <br />(3) Will existing lots less than 2 acres in size become "non- conforming" if <br />Staffs recommendations are adopted? (CG) <br />(4) What is the difference between a lot and a farm? (LR) <br />b) TDRs <br />i) When will a Transfer of Development Rights (TDR) program be available in <br />Orange County? (Cks, Eno) <br />ii) Where in the county could a receiving area for Transfer of Development <br />Rights (TDR) be applied? (CH) <br />c) Zoning <br />i) Has Staff considered creating any agriculturally exclusive zoning districts? <br />(CH) <br />ii) Has Staff considered creating a zoning district that would allow agricultural <br />subdivisions or "farmettes'? (CH) <br />d) Transit <br />i) What are the plans for public commuter rail through Orange County? (Hills) <br />ii) Are there plans for public transportation in the Efland- Cheeks area? (Cks) <br />3) Development atanuarus - nvw 0uZ)LaJJJ0uJV ���•y••� <br />a) Subdivision Type and Design <br />i) Conventional <br />(1) Is Staff proposing that the county do away with the conventional <br />development option? (CH) <br />ii) Dev. Nodes <br />(1) What is a "Rural Activity Node" and what are the recommended uses <br />within them? (Bigm) <br />(2) What is the process and what are the requirements to create a new or <br />expand an existing Commercial Node? (Eno) <br />iii) Multifamily <br />(1) Where in the county can multi- family development be accommodated? <br />(Eno) <br />iv) Major, Minor, & Exempt <br />(1) Will the definitions of Minor and Major Subdivisions and their respective <br />approval processes remain the same? (Eno) <br />(2) Is the minor subdivision process the same for those who are subdividing <br />for relatives and those subdividing for profit? (Bigm, Cks, Eno) <br />(3) Is there any way to expedite the minor subdivision approval process? <br />(Bigm, Cks) <br />(4) Will the proposed recommendations encourage exempt, 10 -acre lot, <br />subdivisions? (CH) <br />11 -D -3 <br />*Abbreviations: Bigm = Bingham; CG = Cedar Grove; CH = Chapel Hill; Cks = Cheeks; LR = Little River; <br />Hills = Hillsborough <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.