Browse
Search
OUTBoard agenda 101718
OrangeCountyNC
>
Advisory Boards and Commissions - Active
>
Orange Unified Transportation Board
>
Agendas
>
2018
>
OUTBoard agenda 101718
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
11/13/2018 4:06:43 PM
Creation date
11/13/2018 4:06:04 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
BOCC
Date
10/17/2018
Meeting Type
Regular Meeting
Document Type
Agenda
Document Relationships
OUTBoard minutes 101718
(Message)
Path:
\Advisory Boards and Commissions - Active\Orange Unified Transportation Board\Minutes\2018
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
31
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Heidi Perry: What was the first right-of-way? 112 <br /> 113 <br />Nish Trivedi: There are four different street cross sections recommended in the plan, 60, 80, 90, and 100 feet. It 114 <br />included a 60 ft. right-of-way for areas east of Buckhorn Road, 90 ft. right-of-way west of Buckhorn Road, and 80 ft. right-115 <br />of-way for some of the major areas. The study also recommended improvements to various intersections, adding turn 116 <br />lanes for various routes such as US-70, Buckhorn Road, West Ten Road and Ben Wilson Road. As part of community 117 <br />outreach, we sent out letters to property owners in and around the study area. 118 <br /> 119 <br />Ted Triebel: How many people attended the public information meeting? 120 <br /> 121 <br />Nish Trivedi: We sent out over 700 notices about the community meeting. The community meeting was held last August 122 <br />28, 2018 at Gravely Hill Middle School. An estimate 100 people attended. 123 <br /> 124 <br />Heidi Perry: What was the hot topic? 125 <br /> 126 <br />Nish Trivedi: Most wanted to know what is happening with their neighborhood. Some of them were at the intersection of 127 <br />Green and Turner, some were from Mebane. The meeting had nice positive feedback. People engaging in knowing 128 <br />what’s going on in the area. We created a website to keep the public informed and involved in the process and getting 129 <br />more feedback as this process continues. We handed out a survey at the Community meeting to get feedback about 130 <br />what was presented to them. We did not send these surveys through the mail. We also put this on the website, so 131 <br />people can download from the website and return back to us. We have not gotten any back yet from that source. The 132 <br />next steps – we are currently at the next step phase as we presented this to the Planning Board of the 5th of this month in 133 <br />the same way as presented to you in your attachment to provide your comments. We will come back next month in 134 <br />October for your recommendations to present to the Board of County Commissioners’. A tentative Public Hearing is 135 <br />scheduled to go before the Board of County Commissioners’ in November along with the Planning Board’s and 136 <br />OUTBoard’s recommendations. Depending on what they decide to do, they will act in November or December for their 137 <br />decision. The plan will be implemented through the Unified Development Ordinance which requires development be in 138 <br />compliance with adopted local plans like an Access Management Plan and it is through them we would use this 139 <br />Ordinance to ask people to dedicate the right-of-way in the event these roads are needed. Any Questions? 140 <br /> 141 <br />Abigaile Pittman: You have a month to review this plan (which is in your packet) and make comments at the next 142 <br />meeting. 143 <br /> 144 <br />Nish Trivedi: You are welcome to send me any of your comments and I will get the comments together. My contact 145 <br />information is provided. 146 <br /> 147 <br />Heidi Perry: In the Executive Summary near the end it states Orange County uses Access Management Plans to ensure 148 <br />land use decisions take into consideration their impacts on transportation networks. Nothing is said about bicycle safety. 149 <br /> 150 <br />Nish Trivedi: Safety is included; we can include text about bicycle safety if you would like. There are also some of the 151 <br />surveys that were completed at the Community Meeting in your packet, with the questions and answers we asked at the 152 <br />Meeting. 153 <br /> 154 <br />Jenn Sykes: Was Ikea seriously asked about one of those sites? Someone thought Ikea looked at Mebane. 155 <br /> 156 <br />Nish Trivedi: It was at one time going to Cary and then they pulled out. I have not heard about them coming to Mebane. 157 <br /> 158 <br />Heidi Perry: Does anyone else have any questions for Nish? 159 <br /> 160 <br />Nish Trivedi: Just to let you know that from the 2011 E-B-M AMP only one road was built, the service road for Morinaga 161 <br />Candy Factory. Even that road had to go through the NCDOT process. 162 <br /> 163 <br />Heidi Perry: Where is NCDOT with this Plan? 164 <br /> 165 <br />Nish Trivedi: They attended the Community Meeting to answer any questions. There is no design or construction of the 166 <br />roads, nor is there any funding for them. No projects or work are specifically identified in the Plan. 167 <br />5
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.