Orange County NC Website
Approved 8/1/18 <br />SUMMARY NOTES <br />ORANGE COUNTY PLANNING BOARD <br />JUNE 6 , 2018 <br />ORDINANCE REVIEW COMMITTEE <br />NOTE: A QUORUM IS NOT REQUIRED FOR ORDINANCE REVIEW COMMITTEE MEETINGS . <br />MEMBERS PRESENT : Randy Marshall (Vice-Chair), Bingham Township Representative; Kim <br />Piracci, At-Large; Randy Marshall, At-Large; David Blankfard, Hillsborough Township <br />Representative; Alexander Gregory, Chapel Hill Township Representative; Adam Beeman, <br />Cedar Grove Township Representative; Carrie Fletcher, Bingham Township Representative; <br />Lydia Wegman (Chair), At-Large Chapel Hill Township Representative; Patricia Roberts, <br />Cheeks Township Representative; Paul Guthrie, At-Large Chapel Hill Township; Buddy Hartley, <br />Little River Township Representative; <br />MEMBERS ABSENT : Laura Nicholson, Eno Township Representative; Hunter Spitzer, At-Large; <br />STAFF PRESENT : Craig Benedict, Planning Director; Michael Harvey, Current Planning <br />Supervisor; Meredith Kern, Administrative Assistant II <br />AGENDA ITEM 1:Call to Order and Roll Call <br />The meeting began immediately after the Planning Board meeting was adjourned. <br />AGENDA ITEM 2:UNIFIED DEVELOPMENT ORDINANCE (UDO) TEXT AMENDMENTS – <br />IMPERVIOUS SURFACE STANDARDS - To review proposed amendments to the UDO that <br />clarify existing regulations related to the enforcement of impervious surface standards on <br />subdivisions platted and developed before January 1,1994, and modify existing standards <br />governing the transfer of impervious surface area between parcels located within the same <br />watershed protection overlay district. <br />PRESENTER : Michael Harvey, Current Planning Supervisor <br />Michael Harvey reviewed that while county-wide impervious surface standards were established <br />in 1994, such standards had existed for University Lake since the 1970s. He noted that county <br />regulations are, in many cases, more stringent than state standards. The county has spent <br />$80,000 and a 12-week intensive period with 20-hour weekends conducting inspections of <br />streams in the county to prepare to go before the state to argue that the state should not prevent <br />counties from regulating stream buffers to higher standards than the state’s. Orange County was <br />one of four counties that did so. <br />Michael Harvey said Orange County requires subdivision property owners to count the roads as <br />part of the property’s impervious surface. For example, for a 100-acre tract of land allowed to <br />have 500,000 square feet of impervious surface, if there is 200,000 square feet of road, then <br />there is 300,000 square feet left that can be impervious surface. That is done to avoid one lot in <br />that subdivided tract of land being overburdened with impervious surface area that is meant to <br />serve the communities. Before 1994, that wasn’t the case. The policy was enacted in 1999 with <br />some suggestions of following the policy between 1994 and 1999. <br />Michael Harvey continued to explain that there are subdivision projects that in some cases have <br />corner lots where the total impervious surface counts on that property. Over time, if the roadway <br />is expanded, the total impervious surface allowed on the lot shrinks. Also, the overlay districts