Orange County NC Website
Browse       Search
Approved 6/6/2018 <br /> <br />SUMMARY NOTES 1 ORANGE COUNTY PLANNING BOARD 2 MAY 2, 2018 3 <br />ORDINANCE REVIEW COMMITTEE 4 5 <br />NOTE: A QUORUM IS NOT REQUIRED FOR ORDINANCE REVIEW COMMITTEE MEETINGS. 6 7 <br />MEMBERS PRESENT: Randy Marshall (Vice-Chair), Bingham Township Representative; Kim Piracci, At-Large; Randy 8 <br />Marshall, At-Large; David Blankfard, Hillsborough Township Representative; Laura Nicholson, Eno Township 9 <br />Representative; Alexander Gregory, Chapel Hill Township Representative; David Blankfard, Hillsborough Township 10 <br />Representative; Hunter Spitzer, At-Large; Adam Beeman, Cedar Grove Township Representative; Carrie Fletcher, 11 <br />Bingham Township Representative; Lydia Wegman (Chair), At-Large Chapel Hill Township Representative; Patricia 12 <br />Roberts, Cheeks Township Representative; 13 <br /> 14 <br />MEMBERS ABSENT: Paul Guthrie, At-Large Chapel Hill Township; Buddy Hartley, Little River Township 15 <br />Representative; 16 <br /> 17 <br />STAFF PRESENT: Craig Benedict, Planning Director; Michael Harvey, Current Planning Supervisor; Patrick Mallett, 18 <br />Planner II; Ashley Moncado, Planner II; 19 <br /> 20 <br />AGENDA ITEM 1: Call to Order and Roll Call 21 <br />The meeting began at 7:36 p.m., immediately after the Planning Board meeting was adjourned. 22 <br /> 23 <br />AGENDA ITEM 2: UNIFIED DEVELOPMENT ORDINANCE (UDO) TEXT AMENDMENTS – REORGANIZATION OF 24 TABLES OF PERMITTED USES - To continue review and discussion on proposed amendments to the UDO that 25 <br />would reorganize the Tables of Permitted Uses in response to the Byrd v. Franklin County judicial decision and 26 <br />modify other sections to ensure consistency within the ordinance. 27 PRESENTER: Michael Harvey, Current Planning Supervisor 28 <br /> 29 <br />Michael Harvey noted he had provided a synopsis of the changes this evening as a handout. The changes mostly 30 <br />involve combining categories to simplify the table. He noted the intention is to create a more streamlined table, with 31 <br />similar uses grouped together, and only keeping uses separate that have special requirements (like breweries) or 32 <br />that the county wishes to ban. 33 <br /> 34 <br />Michael Harvey anticipates this coming before the Planning Board in August. The county commissioners will be 35 <br />invited to offer comment. 36 <br /> 37 <br />A question was asked about a building permit for the recently erected large flag on U.S. 70, with concern that the 38 <br />pole is already leaning. Michael Harvey answered that the county attorney’s office was looking into whether the 39 <br />flagpole required a building permit. 40 <br /> 41 <br />Michael Harvey cautioned that the attorney’s office is interpreting the text amendments regarding flagpoles differently 42 <br />from how he interpreted that language. Any board members with concerns should express them to the county 43 <br />attorney’s office. 44 <br /> 45 <br />The meeting was adjourned by consensus at 8:01 p.m. 46 <br /> 47 <br /> 48 <br />Lydia N. Wegman, Chair 49