Browse
Search
OCPB agenda 100318
OrangeCountyNC
>
Advisory Boards and Commissions - Active
>
Orange County Planning Board
>
Agendas
>
2018
>
OCPB agenda 100318
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
12/27/2018 2:04:05 PM
Creation date
11/13/2018 3:34:48 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
BOCC
Date
10/3/2018
Meeting Type
Regular Meeting
Document Type
Agenda
Document Relationships
OCPB minutes 100318
(Attachment)
Path:
\Advisory Boards and Commissions - Active\Orange County Planning Board\Minutes\2018
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
152
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
difference between the 2017 and the 2011. Really kind of an update. Much like the 2011 plan, if there is not a lot of 307 <br />development in the area, we won’t see those roads getting built. I mentioned the service road to Morinaga, that was 308 <br />partially funded by DOT and one of the things that DOT looked for, as it wanted to be very careful that it was not 309 <br />providing funding for an individual driveway to go to a business, and one of the things they asked for was for the 310 <br />County to demonstrate how this service road was part of a greater transportation network to serve the area and we 311 <br />were able to demonstrate it was because we had that 2011 Plan. We were able to show them that we had an 312 <br />adopted plan and as a result the State contributed the money and we were able to get that road built. 313 <br /> 314 <br />Randy Marshall: Vision was a very good way to describe the whole process here. A vision for how it could develop 315 <br />and what we would want to see when it is developed, but it doesn’t mean it is going to be developed but if somebody 316 <br />comes in and wants it developed then this is what our vision is, and they can take that into account. 317 <br /> 318 <br />Patricia asked: The yellow roads what does that mean? On Page 6? Also, what about the Richmond, Lebanon Rd 319 <br />how it’s going to connect to the 119 bypass? Answer: Another transit route that was proposed – new bus route 320 <br />proposed. 321 <br /> 322 <br />Nish answered: Every new state road or improvements to state road goes through the state’s SPOT process. The 323 <br />State uses this quantitative data driven process to determine which projects are best suited for funding through the 324 <br />State’s Transportation Improvement Program (STIP). The yellow lines on the map you are referring to are Orange 325 <br />County priorities we submitted to corresponding Metropolitan Planning Organizations to be considered for the current 326 <br />SPOT process. The green lines on the same map are funded projects in the current adopted STIP. The yellow lines 327 <br />you see are the County priorities. These lines did not score for the SPOT process for the State. The green ones you 328 <br />see are funded and approved. The repaving of I-85. 329 <br /> 330 <br />Tom: for example - Buckhorn Road. The county has identified it as one of its transportation priorities and the 331 <br />County attempted to see if that is a project could be funded through the State’s Transportation Improvement Program 332 <br />(STIP). So, what we are looking at here in this section of the draft is just background information. 333 <br /> 334 <br />Planning Board Meeting ended by consensus at 7:50 PM 335 <br /> 336 <br /> 337 <br /> 338 <br /> 339 <br /> 340 <br /> 341 <br />Lydia N. Wegman, Chair 342 <br /> 12
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.