BOA agenda 111218 - cancelled - Laserfiche WebLink

Browse Search

disturbance plan that anticipates the camp’s anticipated total land disturbance at total build-out. This plan shall be updated an included with subsequent site plan submittals. 5. To promote the public health, safety and general welfare as required in Section 5.3.2 (A) (2) (a), to ensure adjacent property values are maintained or enhanced as required in Section 5.3.2 (A) (2) (b), and to ensure the proposed use is in harmony with the general area as required in Section 5.3.2 (A) (2) (c) of the UDO, existing vegetation within 100’ of the property boundary (excluding property frontages along public rights-of-way ) will remain undisturbed. 6. To promote the public health, safety and general welfare as required in Section 5.3.2 (A) (2) (a), to ensure adjacent property values are maintained or enhanced as required in Section 5.3.2 (A) (2) (b), and to ensure the proposed use is in harmony with the general area as required in Section 5.3.2 (A) (2) (c) of the UDO, no amplified sound will be permitted on-site between the hours of 12:00am – 7:00am. 7. To promote the public health, safety and general welfare as required in Section 5.3.2 (A) (2) (a), to ensure adjacent property values are maintained or enhanced as required in Section 5.3.2 (A) (2) (b), and permitted by Orange County Environmental Health, the existing audible Low Pressure alarm associated with the septic system will be replaced with a SMS/MMS notification system. 8. Per Section 2.5 of the UDO, the applicant shall obtain all necessary development permits from the County prior to the initiation of and land disturbing activity associated with the camp, but not limited to: i. Building Permits; ii. Environmental Health Permits; iii. Erosion Control and Stormwater Management Permits; iv. Solid Waste Management Permit; and v. Zoning Compliance Permits. STAFF COMMENT(S): 1. The applicant has offered the above conditions of approval for this request. These conditions address potential impact (namely light, tree preservation and outdoor noise) on adjacent properties. 2. Attachment 4 contains Staff’s evaluation of the proposals compliance with the various standards detailed within these sections. While no major concerns have been expressed, staff is recommending the imposition specif ic conditions of approval offered by the applicant to ensure the project’s compliance with the provisions of the UDO in the event the Board determines the application can be approved. 3. As detailed within Attachment 5 staff has determined the application is consistent with established submittal requirements and there is sufficient documentation demonstrating compliance with established development standards. 31