Orange County NC Website
ID number. So, yes, LeAnn Brown said, it’s her contention that it is impossible for an entity that does not exist to earn 1 <br />income the year before it exists. 2 <br /> 3 <br />Susan Halkiotis said there is not a signature or a date of when this was filed. Usually there is a signature on the 4 <br />Schedule F. 5 <br /> 6 <br />LeAnn Brown said she is looking at it just as the board is and it was attached to Kara Brewer’s application so she does 7 <br />not know when it was filed. 8 <br /> 9 <br />Susan Halkiotis asked if it was an amended return. 10 <br /> 11 <br />Andy Petesch said he does not know the nature of the return. What was requested on the subpoena request was the 12 <br />document submitted to the Department of Revenue with respect to the qualifying farmer exemption. This was part of the 13 <br />exemption application. 14 <br /> 15 <br />Susan Halkiotis said just because the profit-and-loss statement is for 2016 doesn’t mean that it was filed by April 15, 16 <br />2017. 17 <br /> 18 <br />Andy Petesch said all he could say is he does not have more information about that but what he would submit is that 19 <br />the Department of Revenue would be able to look and see whether a filing had been made and it was that department’s 20 <br />determination that the filing was compliant. 21 <br /> 22 <br />Andy Petesch said he would like to respond to the contention that Wild Flora Farm did not exist in 2016 and somehow 23 <br />makes this void. He submitted North Carolina Department of Revenue Directive CD02-1 states that a single-member 24 <br />LLC that is not classified as a corporation is a disregarded entity from its single owner. So, the fact by 2017 when Wild 25 <br />Flora Farm, LLC, did exist and tax returns were filed, and the application was made, there is no distinction between 26 <br />Wild Flora Farm and Kara Brewer from a state or federal tax standpoint. 27 <br /> 28 <br />Susan Halkiotis said there is a distinction for the application. For the application that was produced for the exemption 29 <br />certificate number, there is clearly a distinction. They are asking for the farm’s income and not Kara Brewer’s income. 30 <br /> 31 <br />LeAnn Brown said she would like to object to the document, which does not relate to the farm exemption at all. The 32 <br />document that Andy Petesch just handed the board. She wanted to object to the board receiving it, for the record. 33 <br /> 34 <br />Karen Barrows said so we shan’t. 35 <br /> 36 <br />Susan Halkiotis said she thinks Andy Petesch has said that the employer ID that ends in 804 is the same on all 37 <br />documents. 38 <br /> 39 <br />Andy Petesch said that’s correct. 40 <br /> 41 <br />Barry Katz asked if Kara Brewer had an employer identification number in 2015. 42 <br /> 43 <br />Andy Petesch answered it was issued in 2017. Andy Petesch said the revenue is listed as farm revenue. Whether it 44 <br />was Kara Brewer at the time, because it’s a disregarded entity, this is a question outside this board’s purview. He 45 <br />believes the question before this board is who was the qualifying farm tax exemption certificate issued to. And the card 46 <br />itself says Kara Brewer and Wild Flora Farm. He believes the documents make clear that the entity that the Department 47 <br />of Revenue issued it to is Wild Flora Farm, LLC, vis-a-vis an employer identification number. 48 <br /> 49 <br />Barry Katz checked that Andy Petesch did not think that res jurisdicta and collateral estoppel apply. 50 <br />15