Browse
Search
HPC Minutes 052318
OrangeCountyNC
>
Advisory Boards and Commissions - Active
>
Historic Preservation Commission
>
Minutes
>
2018
>
HPC Minutes 052318
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
11/13/2018 2:06:32 PM
Creation date
11/13/2018 2:06:30 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
BOCC
Date
5/23/2018
Meeting Type
Regular Meeting
Document Type
Advisory Bd. Minutes
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
2
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Attachment 1 <br /> <br /> 1 <br />Orange County <br />HISTORIC PRESERVATION COMMISSION <br /> <br />Meeting Summary <br /> <br />May 23rd, 2018 <br />Old Orange County Courthouse <br />106 W. King Street, Hillsborough <br />___________________________________________________________________________________ <br /> <br />MEMBERS PRESENT: Dickinson, Ireland, Loter, Menius and Peck <br /> <br />MEMBERS ABSENT: None <br /> <br />STAFF PRESENT: Sandbeck GUESTS: Fred Stewart, Architect for Chatwood COA <br /> <br /> <br />ITEM #1: CALL TO ORDER <br />Chair Dickinson called the meeting to order at 6:32 pm. <br /> <br />ITEM #2: CHANGES OR ADDITIONS TO AGENDA: None <br /> <br />ITEM #3: APPROVAL OF MINUTES for April 25th, 2018 (Attachment 1): Peck noted one typo. <br />Ireland moved to approve the minutes as corrected, seconded by Peck; motion approved. <br /> <br />ITEM #4: ITEMS FOR DECISION: <br /> Chatwood Certificate of Appropriateness: <br />Staff began by providing members with a detailed overview of the Certificate of <br />Appropriateness (COA) process for the benefit of new members. Members were referred <br />to the handout labelled “Certificate of Appropriateness Review Script.” The project <br />architect, Fred Stewart, was present to represent the property owners, Frances and Ed <br />Mayes. Staff explained that this was a public meeting and that letters had been sent to <br />adjoining property owners within 500 feet. No property owners responded to the letter with <br />any comments or questions. Staff gave a PowerPoint presentation showing location <br />maps, site plans and historic and modern photos of the Chatwood property, along with the <br />floor plan and elevation drawings depicting the proposed work. Staff described the <br />proposed project work and reviewed how each work item meets or does not meet the <br />official HPC Design Standards. Staff pointed out that the proposed work was approved by <br />the HPC in 2014-15 so this is essentially a resubmittal of the same project with some <br />refinements. The proposed project will consist of a bathroom addition at the east end, and <br />a kitchen addition that will replace the existing 1950s shed room across the rear elevation <br />of the Johnson wing of the house. Discussion followed. There was a consensus that in <br />general, the project as proposed will meet the design standards. However, several <br />members raised some concerns about changes to the windows on the 1845 wing. As <br />proposed, the project will eliminate two original windows on the east wall of the 1845 wing, <br />as part of the bathroom addition and conversion of that wing into a master bedroom suite. <br />In addition, the project calls for removing the two original windows on the south wall, <br />flanking the chimney, and replacing them with larger 9 over 9 windows. Discussion <br />followed. The removal of the original windows and the enlargement of the south windows <br />is not consistent with the design standards. Mr. Stewart reviewed the measurements on <br />the architectural plans and determined that there was a solution, whereby the two <br />windows from the east wall could be shifted to the rear or south wall, and placed to the <br />east and west of the existing windows now flanking the chimney. The two original <br />windows flanking the chimney can then remain in place unchanged and not replaced with
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.