Browse
Search
Agenda - 11-08-2018 3 - Board of Commissioners - Boards and Commissions Appointment Process Discussion
OrangeCountyNC
>
Board of County Commissioners
>
BOCC Agendas
>
2010's
>
2018
>
Agenda - 11-08-2018 Work Session
>
Agenda - 11-08-2018 3 - Board of Commissioners - Boards and Commissions Appointment Process Discussion
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
11/2/2018 10:34:49 AM
Creation date
11/2/2018 10:36:03 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
BOCC
Date
11/8/2018
Meeting Type
Regular Meeting
Document Type
Agenda
Agenda Item
3
Document Relationships
Agenda - 11-08-2018 Work Session
(Message)
Path:
\Board of County Commissioners\BOCC Agendas\2010's\2018\Agenda - 11-08-2018 Work Session
Minutes 11-08-2018
(Message)
Path:
\Board of County Commissioners\Minutes - Approved\2010's\2018
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
8
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Attachment A <br /> <br />1. Discussion Decision Point: <br />-To consider discussing the Adult Care Home CAC and the possibility of the <br />reduction in number of positions (since there are sometimes many vacancies) <br />and/or the option of merging this committee with the Nursing Home CAC. <br />See Attachment B- emails from Autumn Cox, Ombudsman, Area Agency on <br />Aging-TJCOG. <br />. <br />2. Discussion/Decision Point: <br />--To consider the vetting of applicants for certain boards as appointments come <br />up ( i.e. OWASA, BOA, Planning, ABC Board, etc.) by a committee made up of <br />BOCC members (two members) that would then make a recommendation to <br />the BOCC. <br /> <br />3. Discussion/Decision Point <br />--To consider not having elected officials from other jurisdictions representing <br />Orange County on a board/commission. <br />4. Discussion/Decision Point: <br />-Applicants – To consider either revising the Applicant Application to allow <br />applicants to include other governmental boards (municipal) they may be <br />currently serving on OR requiring that applicants can only serve on two advisory <br />boards (which our policy currently states but that only includes other Orange <br />County advisory boards) and including within this parameter for two boards – <br />both Orange County and/or municipal boards. <br /> <br />5. Discussion/Decision Point: <br />- At Large vs Designated Positions- to consider reducing the number of <br />designated positions and replace with at- large positions to better fill more <br />positions on boards/commissions in a timely manner. <br />6. Discussion/Decision Point: <br />-To consider adding appointments on the agendas on a quarterly basis only. <br />(however, there may be “time sensitive” appointments once in a while) <br /> <br />7. Discussion/Decision Point: <br />-To consider moving the Appointments higher up on the Agenda <br /> <br />8. Discussion/Decision Point: <br />-Applicant Interest Listing: Thom Freeman currently contacts applicants before <br />putting up on abstracts to see if they are still interested in a position on a board <br />and if there is no response email/call within a specified timeframe- and it is still <br />less than two years for the application on file, does staff keep applicant on <br />interest list or remove. <br /> <br /> <br /> <br />2
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.