Browse
Search
Minutes 09-06-2018 Work Session
OrangeCountyNC
>
Board of County Commissioners
>
Minutes - Approved
>
2010's
>
2018
>
Minutes 09-06-2018 Work Session
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/11/2019 2:56:36 PM
Creation date
10/17/2018 8:17:38 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
BOCC
Date
9/6/2018
Meeting Type
Work Session
Document Type
Minutes
Agenda Item
10/16/18; 8-a
Document Relationships
Agenda - 09-06-2018 Work Session
(Attachment)
Path:
\Board of County Commissioners\BOCC Agendas\2010's\2018\Agenda - 09-06-2018 Work Session
Agenda - 09-06-2018 Item 1 - Economic Development Districts – Follow-up from Board Retreat
(Attachment)
Path:
\Board of County Commissioners\BOCC Agendas\2010's\2018\Agenda - 09-06-2018 Work Session
Agenda - 09-06-2018 Item 2 - Additional Discussion Regarding the Election Method for Members of the Orange County Board of Commissioners
(Attachment)
Path:
\Board of County Commissioners\BOCC Agendas\2010's\2018\Agenda - 09-06-2018 Work Session
Agenda - 09-06-2018 Item 3 - Discussion on Proposed Nonprofit Capital Funding Policy and Criteria
(Attachment)
Path:
\Board of County Commissioners\BOCC Agendas\2010's\2018\Agenda - 09-06-2018 Work Session
Agenda - 09-06-2018 Item 4 - Board of Commissioners - Boards and Commissions Appointment Process Discussion
(Attachment)
Path:
\Board of County Commissioners\BOCC Agendas\2010's\2018\Agenda - 09-06-2018 Work Session
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
19
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
7 <br /> <br />• Eno EDD is comprised of 776 Acres <br />• $6.3 Million is the most recent cost to serve all 776 acres <br />• The current project ($1.4 million) would serve approx. 100 acres <br />o At an additional cost of $100,000 - $150,000 a private sewer pump <br />system could be installed to serve an additional 100 acres <br /> <br />Utilities in the Eno Economic Development District (map: page 23) <br /> <br />Commissioner Marcoplos referred to the area in solid red on the map, and asked if that <br />is an abandoned area. <br />Commissioner McKee said that area is found in the red dash line area. <br />Craig Benedict, Planning Director, said the dashed circle is more of a redevelopment <br />area, and the 100 acres are primarily undeveloped, and there is a 25,000 square foot building <br />under site review in Durham and a 36,000 square foot site plan under review on undeveloped <br />property in the 100 acre area. He said a 25,000 square foot building has been built already that <br />did not undergo annexation with Durham, but now Durham would like to annex all new <br />buildings. He said staff does not see a problem with this, as long as there is coordination. He <br />said the Eno Small Area Plan has standardized the regulations between both areas, and the <br />same outcomes will be achieved. <br />Chair Dorosin asked if “both areas” could be defined. <br />Craig Benedict said whether it is in Orange County, or whether it is annexed by Durham. <br />Commissioner Rich asked if there is a plan for the dotted line area. <br />Craig Benedict said the area is underdeveloped or undeveloped, and the private <br />property owners are trying to form a 100+ acre area to install their own pump lift station, and <br />pump it across to the new gravity line being installed by the County. He said the County cannot <br />extend the gravity sewer any further than the red box, but residents can pump to it. He said <br />Durham has verbally agreed to this connection should the private property owners wish to pump <br />into the system. He said there are always limitations on the amount of sewer capacity, and <br />Durham is in the process of upgrading the sewer just over the county line, which Orange County <br />can flow into by gravity. He said the $6.3 million would be a large lift station and pumping over <br />3 miles into downtown Durham to find a place that was not over capacity, which is really not <br />feasible. <br /> Commissioner Price said she thought the Board had discussed that the area across from <br />the residential portion would not be economic development, in order to provide a buffer. <br />Craig Benedict said the land use in the lavender portion remains economic development, <br />as this is one of the few districts that has a lower intensity economic development. He said the <br />zoning has not been changed. He said there is such difficulty in serving this entire area, and <br />part of the discussion must be are there better places that can be served more easily from a <br />utility standpoint. He said this has been on the map since the 1980s due to its location, being <br />that it is an interchange to I-85; thus making it an appropriate place for development. <br />Commissioner Price said the residents expressed some concern about the area south of <br />this, and she thought the County was going to try to avoid having industrial development on the <br />other side of the road. <br />Chair Dorosin said there is a lot to consider, and the theme from the retreat was if some <br />of this needs modification. <br />Commissioner Jacobs said Commissioner Price’s recollection is accurate, and there <br />have been several conversations with Duke about the possibility of locating economic research <br />facilities in this area, and Duke has been verbally receptive, but Orange County has not pursued <br />the idea. He said Duke keeps expanding, and there is no reason for the County to not try and <br />make Duke a partner here in this EDD.
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.