Browse
Search
Minutes 09-06-2018 Work Session
OrangeCountyNC
>
Board of County Commissioners
>
Minutes - Approved
>
2010's
>
2018
>
Minutes 09-06-2018 Work Session
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/11/2019 2:56:36 PM
Creation date
10/17/2018 8:17:38 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
BOCC
Date
9/6/2018
Meeting Type
Work Session
Document Type
Minutes
Agenda Item
10/16/18; 8-a
Document Relationships
Agenda - 09-06-2018 Work Session
(Attachment)
Path:
\Board of County Commissioners\BOCC Agendas\2010's\2018\Agenda - 09-06-2018 Work Session
Agenda - 09-06-2018 Item 1 - Economic Development Districts – Follow-up from Board Retreat
(Attachment)
Path:
\Board of County Commissioners\BOCC Agendas\2010's\2018\Agenda - 09-06-2018 Work Session
Agenda - 09-06-2018 Item 2 - Additional Discussion Regarding the Election Method for Members of the Orange County Board of Commissioners
(Attachment)
Path:
\Board of County Commissioners\BOCC Agendas\2010's\2018\Agenda - 09-06-2018 Work Session
Agenda - 09-06-2018 Item 3 - Discussion on Proposed Nonprofit Capital Funding Policy and Criteria
(Attachment)
Path:
\Board of County Commissioners\BOCC Agendas\2010's\2018\Agenda - 09-06-2018 Work Session
Agenda - 09-06-2018 Item 4 - Board of Commissioners - Boards and Commissions Appointment Process Discussion
(Attachment)
Path:
\Board of County Commissioners\BOCC Agendas\2010's\2018\Agenda - 09-06-2018 Work Session
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
19
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
16 <br /> <br /> the current mixed at-large/district method used by Orange County?- 8:57:37 PM <br /> <br />Attachment I depicts the current structure of Orange County’s election method for the Board of <br />Commissioners. Robeson County does not utilize a similar election method. <br /> <br />Robeson County Board of Elections Director G.L. Pridgen has confirmed that the eight <br />members of the Robeson County Board of Commissioners are all elected from eight different <br />electoral districts utilizing a district residency/district nomination/district election method. Each of <br />the eight commissioners must reside in their respective districts, must be nominated by only the <br />voters in their respective districts, and must be elected by only the voters in their respective <br />districts. There are no at large commissioners seats, and no commissioners are nominated or <br />elected at any time on a countywide basis. <br /> <br />Greg Wilder said he thinks voter referendums in counties can only occur in even- <br />numbered years. <br />John Roberts said they can only occur during a primary in which all precincts are open, <br />which would be an even-year primary; in a general election, when all three seats are open; or if <br />the state holds some random election in an odd numbered year. <br />Greg Wilder said given that information, the next opportunity would be May or November <br />2020. <br />Chair Dorosin asked John Roberts if he could summarize what the Board can do without <br />any additional legislative authority. <br />John Roberts said the Board can change the electoral structure by referendum to the <br />voters of all district, all at-large, or a combination of that. He said in a district residence only, <br />with the entire county electing, there are several of those and as long as it is just electoral <br />structure, the Board can do that via referendum. <br />Chair Dorosin clarified that if the Board wanted to go to a 4-3, or a district primary/district <br />general, the general assembly does not to be involved. He asked if there is a referendum, at <br />the primary election in 2020, when it would become effective. <br />John Roberts said it would be not be effective in November of that year, but at the next <br />election cycle. He said the Board would need to designate which seats are which, and it would <br />become effective as people come up for election. <br />Commissioner Burroughs said she considers the census numbers, and how they play <br />into this. She said if everything is kept the same, except changing to district nominated/district <br />in 2020, then the census data could be reviewed and the change implemented in 2022. <br />Greg Wilder said in 2020 the census data from 2010 would have to be used to develop a <br />map to be voted on in 2020. He said if this was adopted, the map would then have to be <br />revised with the new 2022 census data. <br />John Roberts said the map would only need to be revised if there was a significant <br />discrepancy. <br />Commissioner Burroughs said this happened in 2010, and everything was fine in the <br />end. <br />Greg Wilder said the County went through an evaluation process, and there were <br />changes, but they remained within the standard deviation of 5%. <br />Commissioner Burroughs said she is inclined to keep everything the same, except to <br />add the district elected. <br />Commissioner Price asked if this would leave the at-large positions. <br />Commissioner Burroughs said yes, in her thinking. <br />Commissioner McKee said he is supportive of this, and is wary of doing anything that <br />would involve the legislature. He said no one should think that the effective representation rural <br />versus urban is going to change. He said the breakdown of the Board is not rural versus urban,
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.