Agenda - 06-23-2004-8b - Laserfiche WebLink

Browse Search

e, An improved vicinity map indicating the location of adjacent properties and structures, 2. The applicant shall submit information regarding the pros and cons of siting the fields where they are located and moving the fields. 3. Smart design alternatives should be considered including reduction of footprints, cost savings and designing the school/park site so they work together and compliment each other. 4, Consideration of draining the pond and what the southwest corner of the site will be used for in the future. 5, Field locations should be considered on the adjacent County owned property and indicate how the property will be protected to allow the northern environmentally sensitive area to be reclaimed from the clear cutting that has occurred, 6, Traffic safety has been addressed in the traffic impact study and turn lanes are to be provided at applicant 's expense. Additional right-of-way will be dedicated on the applicant's side of West Ten Road to accommodate the improvements, (See finding 8,8.30.3.c,) 7. Documentation, provided on page 142 of this packet, in the form of a memo (dated April 23, 2004) from the School Board (also included in the Public Hearing packet on pages 113-118) indicates that the School Board responded to the Planning Board concerns. This memo (with attachments) states that the School Board revised the site plan by shifting the athletic fields. The memo also relayed information pertaining to the School Board's acquisition of timber rights from Mr, Allison at the time of property purchase to provide protection to the environment. In the April 7, 2004 meeting, the Planning Board recommended DENIAL of the Special Use Permit to the BQCC based on the application as submitted not meeting the criteria for approval. The Planning Board found in the negative on fallowing findings: Articles: 8.8.30c,2 Landscape Design (Specific finding); 8,8.30d Multiple shared use opportunities (Specific finding); 8,2,1,b.1 Use will maintain or promote the public health, safety and general welfare (General finding); 8.2.1.b.3. Use is in harmony with the area and in compliance with the plan for the physical development of the County (General finding). However, the Planning Board voted to recommend approval of the additional conditions in the Revised Resolution of Approval that was submitted to the Planning Board. Attached is a Revised Resolution of Approval that was submitted to the Board of County Commissioners at the Public Hearing, which was revised, based on new site plan submitted, after Planning Board review to address Planning Board concerns, Planning Staff recommends that the Revised Resolution be approved by the Planning Board, After receiving the additional information at the Public Hearing and the additional information provided after the Public Hearing, the Planning Board shall reconsider the previous negative findings and determine if the applicant's efforts to resolve the reasons for the negative findings have been accomplished.