Orange County NC Website
There will be a need for easement reservations through the middle school site to serve the <br />proposed soccer complex/public use to the east, Close coordination between the middle school <br />and the soccer complex/public, sites during the construction will be necessary to ensure that <br />water and sewer easements are placed in appropriate locatiens. If the locations have not been <br />specified prior to final plat recordation stage, a blanket easement conveyed to Orange County <br />will be needed to allow the installation of public lines, <br />Impervious Surface Requirements: <br />The property is located in the Economic Development District (EDD) and the Upper Eno <br />Protected Watershed, The maximum impervious surface ratio permitted without a structural <br />BMP is 12 percent, The site plan contains no BMP and shows an impervious surface ratio of 13 <br />percent, Either the impervious surface ratio must be reduced to 12 percent or less, or a <br />structural BMP must be included on the site plan and constructed and operated to ordinance <br />standards, If the school site and the soccer complex is developed simultaneously (i,e. joint <br />driveway), there is a possibility that the impervious surface allocation can be spread across bath <br />sites thereby eliminating the requirement of constn~cting an expensive, structural BMP storm <br />water pond. <br />Environmental Assessment: <br />A-Fiadiflg-ef-tile-Signif} ee+}reseived-#rern-the-ap . <br />stet-yet fieit~-verified-(aka-made-a~risdistienal-Beterrwiaatien)-tlie-sea°~~,+^~A~-,~~-f~^d++~gs-of-tl-ie <br />extent etwetlands--en-the-site-once-the-Iesatien-and-tqe-extent ef-tlte-t~~,4CE-vvetlai~d <br />jar+sdist+onal-deter-minatien-as-v,°I;-as-t"e-methed-thattMe-appiisants-prspa~~~o-...;,.;. ;ze~,",e <br />etlan <br />appreual-Alse-t#e-B+elBg~sal-4nven-tern-+ndfeates-+h.,++h~ ~.,.,cre_are-;e~a}~eels-en-the site: T,-he <br />MaY-7994--site-plan-has-Mb ~ ge-censerns-and-pretest wetlands-on <br />the-s+te: <br />A Finding of No Significant Impact (FONSI) has been received from the applicant with <br />regard to the original site layout. This determination is based, in part, on the Wetland <br />Preliminary Assessment performed by the consultant hired by the school system. Staff <br />was not able to concur with this finding due to the fact that the United States Army Corps <br />of Engineers (USAGE) has not field verified (AIW made a Jurisdictional Determination) <br />the consultant's findings of the extend of the wetlands on the site. If the USAGE had <br />made a jurisdictional determination of the location and extent of the USAGE wetlands as <br />well as the methods that the applicants proposed to minimize the impact and effect on <br />the wetlands, staff would have been in a better position to recommend approval of the <br />original site plan. Also, the Biological Inventory indicates that there are vernal pools on <br />the site. However, staff recommends approval because the May 7, 2004 site plan was <br />revised to eliminate drainage concerns and to avoid wetlands and vernal pools on the <br />site. <br />Development Process, Schedule, and Action <br />Articles 8,4,3 and 8,4,4 of the Zoning Ordinance require that the Zoning Officer's <br />recommendation be presented to the Planning Board. The public hearing is the time <br />scheduled for presentation of the Zoning Officer's recommendation. <br />