Browse
Search
Agenda - 05-05-2005-1b
OrangeCountyNC
>
Board of County Commissioners
>
BOCC Agendas
>
2000's
>
2005
>
Agenda - 05-05-2005
>
Agenda - 05-05-2005-1b
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/19/2017 12:30:54 PM
Creation date
8/29/2008 10:21:33 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
BOCC
Date
5/5/2005
Document Type
Agenda
Agenda Item
1b
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
105
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
rxcerpt from October 1, 1996 APPENDIX N <br />Commissioners' Meeting <br />Minutes 112 <br />A motion was made by Commissioner Halkiotis, seconded by Chair Carey to reconsider the <br />action that was taken on this item on September 3, 1996, <br />VOTE: AYES, 3; NOS, 2 (Commissioners Gordon and Willhoit) <br />Steve Yuhasz made comments on behalf of the owner and developer. He said that this <br />proposal is in accordance with the Zoning Ordinance. The arrangement of this property does <br />maximize the area for septic systems which have been approved by the Orange County Health <br />Department. The main reason he wants the plan approved is that this is how the family members want <br />it developed. The family acknowledged that they do understand and will abide by the restrictions <br />placed on this development. <br />A motion was made by Commissioner Crowther, seconded by Commissioner Halkiotis to <br />approve the Planning Board recommendation as stated in the agenda and in the resolution of <br />approval <br />Commissioner Gordon noted that she favored the Planning Staff recommendation which <br />included the condition adopted by the Commissioners on September 3, <br />VOTE: AYES, 4; NOS, 1 (Commissioner Gordon) <br />C. Community School for People Under Six Funding Request <br />Anna Mercer- McLean made reference to the expansion of their facility and explained that <br />because of zoning compliance requirements, the extra cost will range from $15,000 to $20,000. <br />The County Commissioners asked for additional information and said that this item will be <br />placed on the next agenda for further discussion. <br />10. REPORTS 40M <br />a, Report: Potential Residential Districts for Commissioner Elections <br />The Board considered a draft of potential Residential Districts for future election of County <br />Commissioners.. Under this proposal, the current staggered terms and partisan primary process would <br />continue to apply. The County would be divided into five Residential Districts of roughly -equal <br />population with approximately 18,770 citizens and each district would be represented by one seat on <br />the Board. All registered voters in the County would be eligible to vote on all candidates in the years <br />they represent their party in a general election. Only registered voters of a particular party would vote <br />on candidates in their party in the primary election. In creating Residential Districts, census data is the <br />accepted standard for reliable information to ensure equally - proportioned districts. To create a draft of <br />potential Residential Districts, Planning staff has utilized a demographic software program to configure <br />five districts of roughly -equal population using 1990 Census data. <br />Geoffrey Gledhill distributed copies of the General Statutes that are pertinent to this issue. <br />He explained the process that must be followed in order to initiate such a change. It starts with <br />developing districts which is what the Board has before it tonight. The County Commissioners would <br />adopt a resolution outlining the specific districts and it would then be presented for voter approval. If it <br />receives voter approval, then there are other procedural steps that would need to be followed. He said <br />that the districts should be equal in population when first defined, however, when the Commissioners <br />redefine the districts, they do not have to be equal in population. <br />Commissioner Gordon said she feels that in this proposal the districts have no political <br />coherence; who would a commissioner from any given district represent? She does not believe this is <br />a step forward <br />Chair Carey feels that this would increase the probability that citizens who live in rural areas <br />will have a reasonable chance of being elected. <br />Commissioner Halkiotis feels this is a good start. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.