Browse
Search
Agenda - 05-05-2005-1b
OrangeCountyNC
>
Board of County Commissioners
>
BOCC Agendas
>
2000's
>
2005
>
Agenda - 05-05-2005
>
Agenda - 05-05-2005-1b
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/19/2017 12:30:54 PM
Creation date
8/29/2008 10:21:33 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
BOCC
Date
5/5/2005
Document Type
Agenda
Agenda Item
1b
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
105
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
J'Wi11 �. <br />111 West Corbin St. <br />Hillsborough, NC 27278 <br />June 21, 1993 <br />94 <br />TO: Other Members of the Task Force on the Process for Electing <br />Orange County Commissioners <br />FROM: Rich Hammer <br />SUBJECT: May 1990 voting data which shows a sharp division within <br />Orange County, between city and rural parts <br />In the spring of 1990 I got active in County politics, attempting <br />to speak on behalf of rural property owners who dislike controls <br />imposed by County government. <br />After running in the Republican primary that May, I studied the <br />votes and compared the trends in the two parts of the county. The <br />contrast between the two parts can be seen most clearly in the votes <br />cast in the Democratic primary, in which there were eight active <br />candidates running for three seats. <br />Attached you will find a copy of a column which I wrote at that <br />time, and (should you be interested) a spreadsheet of the data. Also. <br />in the table below I summarize the data in that vote. Clearly the <br />people in the rural precincts would have elected other candidate, had <br />they had the chance. <br />City <br />City <br />Rural <br />Rural <br />vote <br />place <br />vote <br />place <br />finish <br />finish <br />Chapel <br />Hill Candidates <br />who won <br />Gordon <br />4030 <br />2 <br />1006 <br />8 <br />Halkiotis <br />3681 <br />3 <br />1854 <br />3 <br />Insko <br />4515 <br />1 <br />1189 <br />7 <br />Rural <br />candidates supported <br />by landowners associations <br />Carroll <br />1055 <br />5 <br />2220 <br />2 <br />Lloyd <br />1128 <br />4 <br />2898 <br />1 <br />Tripp <br />425 <br />8 <br />1208 <br />6 <br />Other <br />candidates (rural) <br />Gatewood <br />671 <br />7 <br />1334 <br />5 <br />Walters <br />802 <br />6 <br />1388 <br />4 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.