Browse
Search
Agenda - 05-05-2005-1a
OrangeCountyNC
>
Board of County Commissioners
>
BOCC Agendas
>
2000's
>
2005
>
Agenda - 05-05-2005
>
Agenda - 05-05-2005-1a
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
9/1/2008 11:31:46 PM
Creation date
8/29/2008 10:21:19 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
BOCC
Date
5/5/2005
Document Type
Agenda
Agenda Item
1a
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
54
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
7 <br />Orange County Board of Commissioners <br />Page 2 <br />September 24, 1996 <br />the constitutionality of North Carolina's representational <br />equality-based system far electing boards of commissioners. This <br />very recent decision reversed a federal district court decision <br />which determined that electoral equality was constitutionally <br />required. The United States Court cf Appeals for the Fourth <br />Circuit concluded that when all aspects of equal representation <br />are considered as a whole, it becomes clear that representati,oral <br />equality is at least as important as electoral equality in a <br />representative democracy. And, the decision as to what system to <br />use is a decision that should be made by the State of North <br />Carolina and not the federal courts in the inherently political <br />and legislative process of apportionment. <br />The electoral district choices available to the Board <br />follow. No more than ha.1f of the board may be apportioned to the <br />county at large in each case.l <br />'A "proportional" or "cumulative" election system has been <br />proposed to you by some members of the Orange County community. <br />Each is a system whereby each voter gets to vote the number of <br />"seats" up for election and may cast all of their seat votes for <br />one candidate or some number of candidates less than the total. <br />Put another way, if there are three seats on the Board of County <br />Commissioners up for election, a voter has a choice of casting as <br />many as three votes for one candidate or casting a vote for each <br />candidate or any combination in between. Orange County has no <br />statutory authority to use this method of electing boards of <br />county commissioners. Further, it is a method of electing county <br />commissioners generally."foreign" nationwide. I am told it has <br />been tried in a few communities, typically to cure past Voting <br />Rights Act violations. Cumulative voting is a common method of <br />voting for members of the board of directors of for-profit <br />corporations and is intended to provide minority stockholders <br />with electoral access to the board of directors. There is no <br />"suspect class" (racial, ethnic, etc. minority) of Orange County <br />voters presently lacking electoral access to the Orange County <br />Board of Commissioners so far as I know. Since there is no <br />interest among the Board in this method of electing commissioners <br />and since i.t is net authorized by North Carolina law, I ha:re done <br />no research into whether a system of cumulative voting in Orange <br />County would conflict with the "one person, one vote" and other <br />important principles of the Voting Rights Act. This <br />research would have to be done before Orange County could <br />undertake s*uch a system of electing its Board of Commissioners. <br />As a final note on this, the practice of "sing.le-shot" voting is <br />a modified method of proportional voting which is authorized <br />under North G.rolina law. If exercised skillfully by a voting <br />i,lnck; ; t can be ve.^~ effective. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.