Browse
Search
SWAG agenda 052015
OrangeCountyNC
>
Advisory Boards and Commissions - Active
>
Solid Waste Advisory Group
>
Agendas
>
2015
>
SWAG agenda 052015
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
9/10/2018 4:38:30 PM
Creation date
9/10/2018 4:27:02 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
BOCC
Meeting Type
Regular Meeting
Document Type
Agenda
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
23
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Memorandum <br />To: Solid Waste Advisory Group <br />From: George Seiz, Carrboro Public Works Director <br />Lance Norris, Chapel Hill Public Works Director <br />Ken Hines, Hillsborough Public Works Director <br />Gayle Wilson, Orange County Solid Waste Director <br />Subject: Staff Suggested Priority Solid Waste Issues (revised -2) <br />Date: May 20, 2015 <br />Towns and County staff were requested by the Solid Waste Advisory Board to prepare a list of <br />solid waste issues and their relative priorities for consideration and discussion at the April 1, <br />2015 meeting. At the April 1 meeting the SWAG proposed several revisions /suggestions that <br />are reflected in the memorandum below. Additional revisions were made at the April 22 <br />meeting, including a request to provide a chart or other graphic representation of the listed <br />short to mid -term priorities. <br />A Gantt Chart is provided (attached) for SWAG review. The 13 short to mid -term priorities are <br />listed and tracked over a five year period. Following SWAG review and approval of the Gantt <br />Chart format staff will finalize. Once endorsed by the SWAG the chart will be refined and <br />maintained as an ongoing practice, with additional task details added or modified as necessary. <br />Guiding Principles <br />Your staffs have discussed and evaluated various topics and opportunities to provide a technical <br />or industry and local government managerial professional viewpoint. Staffs have utilized <br />varying degrees and in a general sense the following standards /criteria in our issue discussions <br />and have amended the list of priorities based on April 1 and April 22 SWAG comments. <br />• Potential to reduce waste and /or increase recycling <br />• Other environmental impacts such as fuel usage, toxicity reduction, pollution <br />prevention, etc. <br />• Cost and Cost Effectiveness <br />• Efficiency <br />• Citizen understanding /user friendliness /complexity /equity <br />• Industry best management practices <br />• Innovation /Creativity <br />• Public Involvement, and <br />• Environmental Education and Outreach <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.