Orange County NC Website
53 <br />1. Lower overall financing costs. Tax - exempt debt is generally less costly than <br />private debt - equity structures, even if the private debt portion of the <br />financing is through tax - exempt private activity bonds. <br />2. More waste flow control. Public owners have a greater ability to control waste <br />flow to their facilities based on the recent Oneida - Herkimer Supreme Court <br />decision (See reference in Section 4.0). <br />3. Post - financing control. After the expiration of the initial financing, usually 20- <br />30 years, the County would still be the owner of the plant, reaping the benefit <br />of lower disposal costs without debt service payments, and not subject to <br />market pricing by a private owner - operator. Several existing plants, <br />especially in New England, are now reaching the end of their initial service <br />agreements and financings, and the communities they are serving that still <br />need disposal services are facing higher tipping fees or loss of guaranteed <br />available capacity. <br />Of course, the actual procurement method should be the result of an open <br />procurement process with several alternatives open to proposers to suggest as they <br />deem them advantageous to the County. <br />5.1.2 Assumptions <br />The following are the assumptions used for the pro forma Operating Statement: <br />1. Size /Throughput. As stated above, the representative plant is 300 TPD <br />processing a total of 87,600 tons per year, which equals an availability of <br />about 80 percent. The remainder of the annual waste generated would need <br />to be transferred and landfilled; a cost of $50.00 per ton has been assumed <br />for bypass. <br />2. Ash Generation /Disposal. Using a rule of thumb, 25 percent of the annually <br />processed waste (21,900 tons) would remain as ash after the thermal <br />recovery process. The ash can be disposed at a landfill at $50.00 per ton but <br />may have to be disposed separately from the bypassed waste in an ash <br />monofill. If found to be hazardous, ash would need to be separately disposed <br />of as a hazardous waste. The cost of such ash management would be in the <br />range of $150 to $250 per ton, including transportation and disposal at a <br />specially designed and operated landfill. If a beneficial use, such as <br />alternative daily landfill cover, was found, the cost could be reduced. <br />3. Capital Cost /Financing. The capital cost per ton is set at $150,000 per ton of <br />installed capacity or a total of $45 million. The effective net amount to be <br />financed was estimated at 125 percent of the cost of the installed capacity, <br />taking into account development and permitting costs, financing costs, etc. <br />That brings the total financed to $56.25 million. The all -in cost of financing <br />using revenue bonds was estimated at 5 percent for 25 years, an annual <br />financing factor of 0.0651, bringing net annual debt service to $3.99 million. <br />4. Electricity Revenues. The net amount of electricity generated from the <br />system, excluding in -plant use was set at 350 kilowatt -hours per ton <br />processed. The assumed price of the electricity sold was $0.06 per kilowatt - <br />hour, which is typical of what many plants receive for their electrical sales. <br />Any electrical agreement and its associated price would have to be negotiated <br />with the utility. It was also assumed that the plant operator would receive 10 <br />percent of the electricity sales as an incentive payment, with 90 percent going <br />to the County. <br />GBB/C08027 -01 24 August 15, 2008 <br />