Browse
Search
SWAG agenda 042215
OrangeCountyNC
>
Advisory Boards and Commissions - Active
>
Solid Waste Advisory Group
>
Agendas
>
2015
>
SWAG agenda 042215
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
9/10/2018 4:35:48 PM
Creation date
9/10/2018 4:24:53 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
BOCC
Meeting Type
Regular Meeting
Document Type
Agenda
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
135
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
29 <br />concern about greenhouse gases, a change in flow control legislation, and the <br />increasing cost of long distance transfer and disposal. <br />Recent activity in the evaluation and procurement of WPT by other U.S. cities and <br />counties is detailed. Like Orange County, these localities are exploring alternatives <br />for service to their citizens. Information on the investigations of New York City, the <br />City of Los Angeles, Los Angeles County, and King County, WA into the applicability <br />of WPT is highlighted. Current WPT procurements are outlined, including: a resource <br />recovery facility for Frederick and Carroll Counties, MD; expansion of the Harford, <br />MD WTE facility; negotiations by the City of Sacramento, CA for a plasma gasification <br />project; Broward County, FL's Request for Expressions of Interest to evaluate <br />potential waste disposal options; a plasma arc gasification project proposed in St. <br />Lucie County, FL; and WTE plant expansions in Hillsborough and Lee Counties, FL, <br />that are currently being constructed. A total of 80 technology vendors offering 14 <br />different technologies are represented, evaluated, screened, or selected during these <br />research and procurement projects. <br />The economic characteristics of the various waste processing technologies, including <br />capital and operating costs and risk, are summarized in the report. Generally, <br />capital cost for the proven technologies are in the range of $150,000 to $250,000 <br />per ton of installed capacity, depending on size and plant configuration. Operating <br />costs are in the range of $35 to $60 per ton processed, not including residue <br />disposal, again dependent on size, equipment and operating profile, and assuming a <br />private operator. These figures are based on industry rules -of- thumb, recent <br />operating results from selected facilities, surveys of industry professionals and <br />related references. <br />Of the waste processing technologies examined, only WTE is a proven technology <br />which could be recommended for implementation consideration by Orange County at <br />this point in time. As mentioned earlier, there are 89 WTE plants generating power <br />in the U.S. and hundreds worldwide. The other technologies discussed are in various <br />stages of development and are not mature enough to mitigate the risks potentially <br />inherent with their implementation. <br />In evaluating waste processing technologies for Orange County to consider, it is <br />apparent that there is not enough waste generated by the County to gain the <br />economies of scale necessary to make a waste processing technology a cost - effective <br />investment. The estimated cost to process waste at a 300 TPD WTE facility in <br />Orange County is estimated at $102 per ton. To improve the economics of utilizing <br />waste processing technology, Orange County would need to partner with an adjacent <br />community. The $102 per ton is not competitive with the County's current landfill <br />disposal fee of $49 or with Waste Industries' cost of $42 per ton to transfer and <br />dispose of waste. <br />Although currently unknown, the cost of the County's new transfer station and <br />landfilling at a remote site is unlikely to reach $102 per ton. As the County <br />investigates the cost of transfer and disposal in preparation of its landfill closing, <br />WPT could be more economically attractive once the cost of transfer and disposal is <br />known. If $102 per ton were to look competitive, it is recommended that Orange <br />County conduct a WTE plant feasibility study which considers mass -burn modular <br />technologies, and /or fuel production approaches. <br />GBB/C08027 -01 ES -2 August 15, 2008 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.