SWAG agenda 012915 - Laserfiche WebLink

Browse Search

9 The second set of documents (Attachment 2 -5) presents opportunities and key factors for each of the four proposed solid waste funding options as viewed by staff. Given the various perspectives regarding advantages and disadvantages and equity, staffs have resisted employing these terms but assume the SWAG will not be similarly constrained. Decision Process Aside from the individual impacts and characteristics of each option, another important issue related to selection of a fee recommendation is specifically how the SWAG will arrive at a final fee recommendation. Little discussion has taken place to date regarding how or when the SWAG will finalize a recommended funding option. It has been suggested that one such opportunity where a recommendation could be presented to the elected boards is at a currently scheduled March 26th joint meeting between the County Commissioners and the Chapel Hill Town Council. Perhaps this meeting could be modified to allow a solid waste funding conversation between all elected boards prior to the regularly scheduled joint meeting. Alternatively, another opportunity would be needed for this joint board discussion and final decision. Each individual elected board will establish its own funding option adoption schedule and provisions should be considered in the event all four elected boards do not agree on the same funding option. Additionally, it would be necessary to allow public comment on whatever recommendation may be favored or even on all of the options under consideration. Thus, it is critical that the SWAG discuss the decision making timeline and process for reaching a final decision to ensure implementation for the 2015/16 fiscal year. Questions for consideration by the SWAG include: • How and when does the SWAG intend to reach a final decision /recommendation from among the four funding options? • Should the SWAG adjust its meeting schedule, understanding the timeline required to implement a new funding option as discussed below? • How will the public be provided input into the decision making process, presumably following a SWAG recommendation but prior to the Towns /County boards' adoption of a funding option? • Following a SWAG fee decision, would the governing boards consider a resolution authorizing the Managers to negotiate a Memorandum of Understanding to authorize the fees for FY 2015/16 until a more formal Interlocal Agreement can be negotiated over the summer and adopted by the Towns and County in the fall? Decision Timeline Another significant factor for SWAG consideration is the decision making timeline that will provide sufficient time for the County Commissioners to incorporate the funding into the proposed FY 2015/16 budget for approval by the June 16th BOCC meeting and allow County Solid Waste and County Tax Administration Department staff to make the necessary fee database adjustments and billing form formatting preparations for the 2015 tax billing which is scheduled to be mailed in July. Based on County staff discussions with the County Finance Department, the proposed budget could be revised in early June in order to meet the scheduled budget adoption schedule of June 16th. However, County Solid Waste staff may need several days prior to the County Finance Department deadline to actually