Browse
Search
SWAG agenda 091616
OrangeCountyNC
>
Advisory Boards and Commissions - Active
>
Solid Waste Advisory Group
>
Agendas
>
2016
>
SWAG agenda 091616
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
9/10/2018 4:08:52 PM
Creation date
9/10/2018 3:59:45 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
BOCC
Meeting Type
Regular Meeting
Document Type
Agenda
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
91
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
46 <br />Orange County, NC <br />Financial Plan and Rate Study for Solid Waste Enterprise Fund <br />5.0 FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS <br />This findings and recommendations, including revenue increase strategies, expense reduction <br />strategies, and rate benchmarking from the Study are presented below. SCS offers the following <br />findings and recommendations for the County's consideration: <br />• As outlined in Scenario 1, the Fund's current financial structure is unsustainable and <br />maintaining the current Program Fee amount ($107) along with the Status Quo <br />program services will yield significant annual deficits over the next 5 -year period, <br />both with the current practice of General Fund contributions (Scenario B) and without <br />(Scenario A). <br />• The exercise of allocating monies from the Fund's balance ( "Reserves ") to cover the <br />annual budget deficit each year will deplete the entire Fund balance in approximately <br />5 years. Furthermore, this jeopardizes Fund liabilities such as landfill post - closure <br />care. <br />• As outlined in Scenario 2, increasing the current amount of the Program Fee to $130 <br />per year, which represents a 23 percent escalation, is anticipated to be insufficient to <br />eliminate significant annual deficits, both with the current practice of General Fund <br />contributions (Scenario B) and without (Scenario A). <br />• As outlined in Scenario 3A, even increasing the current amount of the Program Fee to <br />$150 per year (43 percent increase) is projected to be insufficient to eliminate <br />significant annual deficits unless the General Fund continues to contribute nearly $2 <br />million per year. <br />• In the spirit of a true enterprise fund, the County would need to implement a Solid <br />Waste Program Fee between $170 and $180 to fully fund all anticipated program <br />expenses over the next 5 years. This is reflected in Scenario 4A and anticipates no <br />General Fund contribution and no Appropriated Fund Balance revenues other than the <br />identified loan proceeds for Waste and Recycling Center construction. <br />• As an alternative to solely increasing the Program Fee, the County could take a "dual <br />approach" by increasing the General Fund as well as increasing the Program Fee. The <br />increase of the General Fund contribution should occur within the Sanitation Services <br />Division to raise the Division's revenue from approximately $2 million to <br />approximately $3 million to cover the annual deficit incurred in that Division. <br />A Revenue and Extension (R &E) Fund should be established to enable the <br />Department to fund a reserve of 25% of its annual operating costs. This Fund would <br />be designed to provide potential funding for unforeseen operational costs and declines <br />in generated revenue. This would provide a buffer against financial obstacles such as <br />declining recyclable material sale revenue and reduced C &D Landfill tipping fee <br />revenues. Note that the R &E fund would require an increase in the Program Fee <br />above and beyond the break -even fees identified in Scenarios 4A and 4B and could <br />33 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.