Browse
Search
SWAG agenda 091616
OrangeCountyNC
>
Advisory Boards and Commissions - Active
>
Solid Waste Advisory Group
>
Agendas
>
2016
>
SWAG agenda 091616
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
9/10/2018 4:08:52 PM
Creation date
9/10/2018 3:59:45 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
BOCC
Meeting Type
Regular Meeting
Document Type
Agenda
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
91
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
40 <br />Orange County, NC <br />Financial Plan and Rate Study for Solid Waste Enterprise Fund <br />3.2 CONSTRUCT /OPERATE A TRANSFER STATION <br />The Department currently delivers approximately 50 tons per day (TPD) of solid waste to the <br />City of Durham Transfer Station (five days per week). In 2007 a search for a suitable location for <br />a new Orange County transfer station was initiated; this search was terminated in 2009. The <br />County could resume its investigation into the viability of constructing a transfer station utilizing <br />some of the qualitative and quantitative aspects explored in this section. <br />3.2.1 Transfer Station Considerations <br />A decision by the County to develop a transfer station versus direct haul by solid waste <br />collection vehicles to a transfer station or a disposal site (landfill) typically involves examination <br />of the following major variables: <br />• MSW Disposal Site Locations <br />• Average Payloads of Collection Vehicles and Transfer Vehicles <br />• Travel Speed and Distance for Haul Vehicles <br />• Transfer Facility Size, Technology and Operating Practices <br />• Collection and Transfer Vehicle Operating Costs <br />This option assumes the use of a simply - designed, transfer station that utilizes an "open -top" <br />loading system such as the lift and load method. Typically, for smaller -sized stations, the lift and <br />load method, using a front -end loader for compaction, is the most cost effective. With <br />consideration given to the specific needs of the County, the principal features of a potential open - <br />top system could include the following basic features: <br />• Concrete tipping floor on an elevated earth embankment <br />• Temporary floor storage of waste <br />• A metal building and interior concrete containment walls <br />• Trailer drive through for loading <br />• Front -end loader <br />• Additional bay for acceptance and transfer of recyclable material <br />Based on SCS' design experience on transfer stations, we have found that the most cost - effective <br />designs provide appropriate floor storage at the station. In this case, floor storage means simply <br />allowing collection vehicles to dump the waste onto the station's tipping floor where it can be <br />later moved to the transfer trailer by a front -end loader or similar equipment. This process <br />enables reduction in queuing time since the solid waste collection vehicles can enter the facility <br />and unload quickly without being affected by compactor operations. For example, the trucks <br />can continue to unload when bridging occurs or when transfer trailers are unavailable. Several <br />additional considerations are as follows: <br />• In addition, proper floor storage allows the front -end loader to maximize throughput <br />by sorting, mixing, or compacting waste prior to directing it to the pushwalls of the <br />station or into a surge pit. This allows for continual operations when unloading, and <br />transferring becomes essentially two independent operations. Consequently, the <br />design options developed should utilize floor storage as a method to reduce queuing <br />27 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.