Browse
Search
SWAG agenda 082514
OrangeCountyNC
>
Advisory Boards and Commissions - Active
>
Solid Waste Advisory Group
>
Agendas
>
2014
>
SWAG agenda 082514
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
9/6/2018 10:01:49 AM
Creation date
9/6/2018 9:57:43 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
BOCC
Date
8/25/2014
Meeting Type
Regular Meeting
Document Type
Agenda
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
257
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
<br /> Comprehensive Review of <br /> S olid W aste Collection and Disposal Options <br /> <br /> <br />v2.1 55 10/22/12 <br />Exhibit 4 -2. Advantages and Disadvantages Associated With <br />Semi -Automated and Fully -Automated Collection <br />Collection <br />Method Advantages Disadvantages <br />Fully-Automated Maximize productivity <br /> Significantly reduce worker injuries <br /> Municipality can match the productivity <br />of the private sector <br /> Problems with on-street parking <br /> Problems with one-way streets <br /> Problems with low wires <br /> Set out must be limited <br /> New rules and requirements for <br />customers <br /> Specialized driver training to adjust to <br />larger collection vehicles and right-hand <br />driving. <br /> Cost of replacement trucks is higher <br /> More costly and challenging vehicle <br />maintenance <br /> Semi-Automated On-street parking and low wires are not <br />a problem <br /> Allows for flexibility and allows collection <br />personnel to still manually load <br /> Existing fleet can be retrofitted <br /> Cost of trucks and maintenance lower <br /> <br /> Workers exposure to injuries still exist <br /> Not a large productivity gain <br /> <br />Observations of the Towns waste collection observations indicate that fully-automated waste <br />collection could be implemented in many of the currently established routes. Exhibit 4-3 <br />presents an assessment of each collection route’s potential for utilizing fully-automated waste <br />collection vehicles. This assessment is based jointly on SCS’s observations and the Town’s <br />judgment through interviews with a route supervisor. The Town should conduct a routing study <br />that incorporates the ability to collect using full automation. Routes that do not support <br />automation 100% can be split so that the portion that can be automated is combined into another <br />route. Households that do not support automation can be aggregated into separate routes. <br />For applicable solid waste collection and disposal option scenarios, SCS’s pro forma modeling <br />tool includes life-cycle cost analysis of implementing a phased transition to automated <br />collections along select residential collection routes, beginning with a pilot-phase study of a few <br />routes in FY 2014-15. These analyses depict the fiscal impacts over a 30-year period of both a <br />partial transition and full transition to automated collection. These analyses are specifically <br />discussed in Sections 6 and 10, direct hauling of Town solid waste to a transfer station and a <br />landfill respectively. For each of the other scenarios, the pro forma modeling tool allows the <br />capability to quickly forecast the financial impacts of implementing automated collection along <br />with the programmatic changes relevant to the specific waste management scenario being <br />considered.
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.