Browse
Search
SWAG agenda 082514
OrangeCountyNC
>
Advisory Boards and Commissions - Active
>
Solid Waste Advisory Group
>
Agendas
>
2014
>
SWAG agenda 082514
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
9/6/2018 10:01:49 AM
Creation date
9/6/2018 9:57:43 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
BOCC
Date
8/25/2014
Meeting Type
Regular Meeting
Document Type
Agenda
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
257
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
<br /> Comprehensive Review of <br /> S olid W aste Collection and Disposal Options <br /> <br /> <br />v2.1 34 10/22/12 <br />3.1.2.1 Advantages <br /> By utilizing a third-party contractor/private hauler under contract to the Town, the <br />Town will avoid direct capital costs for new recycling collection vehicles and new <br />recycling carts. Similarly, the Town will avoid additional professional salary costs <br />associated with hiring a potentially significant number of new personnel to manage its <br />own program. However, the Town would retain management personnel to oversee <br />the contractor, manage the program and provide outreach and education to its <br />residents. <br /> With implementing third-party contracting for its recyclables, the Town may usurp <br />more control over its recyclable materials than is presently afforded by the County <br />program. The Town could, through its own contract, explore opportunities for <br />increased recycling revenue through various revenue sharing arrangements. <br />Recycling revenue can vary substantially from month to month depending on market <br />conditions. Municipalities that receive a higher revenue share when markets are high <br />will also have a risk of receiving no revenue or even paying the market to take the <br />recyclables when markets are low. For this reason, municipalities often opt to assume <br />less risk by accepting a smaller share of the revenue with the contractor. The Town <br />would need professional guidance to establish revenue sharing terms in the contract to <br />control its risk. <br /> The Town could control the recycling collection schedule and coordinate it with the <br />residential pickup days. <br /> SCS is aware of other experienced private haulers in recyclables collection and <br />management that are capable of providing quality recycling collections. This would <br />promote competitive bids for the Town service. <br />3.1.2.2 Disadvantages <br /> Based on a cursory survey of relative industry service rates, SCS believes it is <br />unlikely, but not impossible, that the Town would receive a more competitive bid <br />than the County currently provides. The County presently dominates a large service <br />area in the region, and as a result, has more bargaining power and can get bulk <br />discounts for operating their program and managing collected materials. <br /> Soliciting a Request for Proposal for Recycling Services and subsequent contract <br />negotiations would require industry-specific expertise to minimize future contract <br />disputes and public relations issues from service levels that might be less than <br />anticipated. <br /> While there are contract instruments, such as bid and performance bonds, that can <br />mitigate the chances of service disruptions under a third-party contract program, the <br />risks of such disruptions are still greater than if it the Town operated its own program.
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.