Browse
Search
SWAG agenda 082514
OrangeCountyNC
>
Advisory Boards and Commissions - Active
>
Solid Waste Advisory Group
>
Agendas
>
2014
>
SWAG agenda 082514
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
9/6/2018 10:01:49 AM
Creation date
9/6/2018 9:57:43 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
BOCC
Date
8/25/2014
Meeting Type
Regular Meeting
Document Type
Agenda
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
257
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
<br /> Comprehensive Review of <br /> S olid W aste Collection and Disposal Options <br /> <br /> <br />v2.1 4 10/22/12 <br />haul to a new or existing landfill), and schedule when certain program modifications are <br />implemented. The model addresses major capital and an operational cost to operate the Town’s <br />solid waste system under various assumptions and configurations as described in more detail <br />below. <br />The model is fairly complex. For each scenario, consistent assumptions are made regarding <br />annual solid waste quantities, population projections, escalation rates for waste growth and costs, <br />administration costs, transportation costs, and landfill, waste-to-energy, and conversion <br />technology processing and disposal costs. The output from the model is an estimate of the net <br />present value (NPV) of each alternative strategy or scenario. NPV costs are calculated for each <br />alternative scenario for the 30-year planning period to allow for comparison of the scenarios <br />from a cost perspective. NPV is the current value of one or more future cash payments and <br />offsetting revenues discounted at an assumed interest rate. A NPV analysis is a useful tool in <br />evaluating alternatives involving complex cash flows. For this analysis, a lower NPV represents <br />a more favorable scenario from an overall cost perspective only. <br />The program scenarios evaluated using the pro forma model are presented below in Exhibit 1-1. <br />Exhibit 1 -1. Pro Form a Model Program Scenarios <br />Designator Description <br />A Status Quo, No New Programs, No Automation of Residential <br />Collections, Town Keeps Commercial Collections <br />B No New Programs, Town Eliminates Commercial-Business Collections, <br />Town Keeps Multi-Family Collections <br />C No New Programs, Town Eliminates All Commercial Collections <br />D Automate Residential Collections, Town Keeps Commercial <br />Collections <br />E Automate Residential Collections, Implement PAYT Program, Town <br />Keeps Commercial Collections <br />F Automate Residential Collections, No PAYT, Town Implement <br />Organics Diversion Program, Town Keeps Commercial Collections <br />G Automate Residential Collections, Implement PAYT, Town Implement <br />Organics Diversion Program, Town Keeps Commercial Collections <br />H Develop New Regional Landfill, Automate Residential Collections, <br />Town Keeps Commercial Collections, No PAYT, No Organics <br />Diversion <br />I New Regional Landfill, Automate Residential Collections, Town <br />Keeps Commercial Collections, PAYT, Organics Diversion
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.