Orange County NC Website
<br /> Comprehensive Review of <br /> S olid W aste Collection and Disposal Options <br /> <br />v2.1 A -18 10/22/12 <br />Subsidize Private -Sector Commercial -Multi -Family Collections <br />Using these analyses, SCS was able to estimate the value of providing commercial-multi-family <br />collections according to the level of service the Town is currently providing. SCS estimates the <br />cost for the Town to provide collection for multi-family accounts is approximately <br />$402,400/year, with offsetting revenues of $54,000/year, for a net cost of $349,000 /year (see <br />Exhibit A-2). Using these data, the Town may evaluate how it may subsidize the cost of <br />privatized commercial-multi-family collections if it so chooses. <br />Based on SCS’s experience in the industry, subsidizing such collection services for private, <br />multi-family housing is rare. However, SCS is aware a decision to either provide or forego a <br />subsidy involves other intangible metrics in addition to this financial analysis, such as: the <br />Town’s values, level of service expectations, citizen equality, and private development. <br />Separating A partment C omplexes from C ondos/T ownhomes <br />SCS evaluated what the impact would be if the commercial-multi-family collections from only <br />Townhomes and Condominiums were given the discounted rates (i.e., one collection per week at <br />no fee), while apartments and other multi-family establishments that aren’t so categorized were <br />charged the full rates for all collections. A preliminary analysis of the revenue impact of <br />modifying the Town’s billing practices to charge non-townhomes and condominium customers <br />the full rates without discount was prepared. There may be other establishments that in a more <br />extensive analysis would also be granted the discounted rates. The net revenue increase the <br />Town might expect is about $135,000 per year. <br /> <br />SCS did not analyze the option of the Town only collection from the condos and townhomes, but <br />suspect the Town would lose significant revenue but still have the basic labor and equipment <br />costs, although operational costs would reduce somewhat (fuel, maintenance), as would the <br />respective disposal costs. <br /> <br />Conclusions and Recommendations Regarding Commercial <br />Collection <br />A summary comparison of each of the commercial collection scenarios evaluated is presented in <br />Exhibit A-12. No significant economic benefit would be achieved by simply eliminating the <br />Town’s commercial-business collection program. SCS’s analysis suggests that only a nominal <br />savings of $22,000/year could be achieved; however, given the number of variables and <br />assumptions associated with the cost allocations between commercial and residential collection <br />programs and the commercial-business and commercial-multi-family functions, the projected <br />savings are well within the margin of error of the analysis. <br />Another scenario that was considered is to continue collection to residential properties (e.g., <br />townhomes and condos), eliminate large multi-family collections (e.g., multiplex apartments) <br />and commercial account collections. Financial analysis of this specific scenario was not <br />performed. Because there would be some further reduction in costs, but no additional revenue, <br />the ballpark estimated savings is believed to be in the $50,000 to $75,000 per year range.