Browse
Search
SWAG agenda 082514
OrangeCountyNC
>
Advisory Boards and Commissions - Active
>
Solid Waste Advisory Group
>
Agendas
>
2014
>
SWAG agenda 082514
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
9/6/2018 10:01:49 AM
Creation date
9/6/2018 9:57:43 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
BOCC
Date
8/25/2014
Meeting Type
Regular Meeting
Document Type
Agenda
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
257
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
<br /> Comprehensive Review of <br /> S olid W aste Collection and Disposal Options <br /> <br />v2.1 ES-2 10/22/12 <br />collection program taking into account potential changes in equipment, personnel, <br />and collection methodology (e.g., automation and vehicle capacity), and <br />collection schedule. A routing and technology study would likely take four to six <br />months to complete. A budget of $50,000 to $70,000 is estimated to complete a <br />routing and technology study. If the routing study was contracted by January <br />2013, it could be completed by mid-2013. Full implementation of any <br />recommended changes likely could be implemented by mid-2014. <br />- Collection Routes. Approve a budget amendment to fund the current collection <br />routing configuration, which includes seven residential curbside collection routes <br />running two days per week, until the routing and technology study described <br />above can be conducted to confirm the most optimum routing and scheduling <br />configuration. The Town’s budget currently includes funding for only six routes, <br />although seven routes are currently being dispatched using temporary employees. <br />SCS evaluated changes that would be needed to the collection schedule to <br />accommodate the currently budgeted six route configuration and concluded that <br />an additional collection day would be needed for residential curbside collection <br />and the routes would need to be reconfigured. Reconfiguring the collection <br />network to six routes and a three-day per week collection frequency appears <br />feasible and could result in potential cost savings compared to fielding seven <br />routes. If the Town were to keep the six route configuration, it would need to <br />reconfigure work schedules (e.g., from the current 4-day, 10-hour per day <br />workweek to a 5-day, 8-hour per day workweek) and reconfigure the collection <br />routes. The routing and technology study recommended above is needed to <br />confirm the feasibility and practicality of these changes and could potentially <br />identify additional alternative routing configurations, staffing, equipment <br />deployment, and collection day schedules. <br />- Automation. Implement a partial transition to fully-automated residential waste <br />collection for a select route or routes in a pilot phase study planned for FY 2014- <br />15, depending on the results of the routing and technology study. This would <br />require the purchase of at least one (and likely two) new automated collection <br />truck(s). SCS recommends the Town consider a 28-cubic yard capacity fully <br />automated collection vehicle. This type of vehicle costs approximately $250,000, <br />compared to the Town’s current 18 to 20-cubic yard semi-automated rear loading <br />vehicles, which have a budgeted replacement value of $139,000.1 Following this <br />pilot study, SCS believes the Town could transition most of the existing routes to <br />full automation within 2 to 4 years with the replacement of collections fleet <br />vehicles in accordance with the current depreciation and vehicle schedule. Cost <br />savings are projected over the 30-year period considered in this study if the Town <br />were to transition to automated collection primarily due to decreased labor costs. <br />Depending on how the routes are configured and staffed (six routes versus seven <br /> <br />1 Another option, not specifically addressed in this study, is the use of compressed natural gas (CNG) vehicles. <br />CNG fuel on a diesel equivalent basis costs significantly less than diesel fuel, and CNG vehicles are quieter, and <br />have fewer emissions. However, CNG vehicles are more expensive (e.g., +$40,000 per vehicle), require special <br />maintenance facilities, have additional maintenance requirements and costs, and require a dedicated special filling <br />station or access to such station.
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.