Browse
Search
SWAG agenda 082514
OrangeCountyNC
>
Advisory Boards and Commissions - Active
>
Solid Waste Advisory Group
>
Agendas
>
2014
>
SWAG agenda 082514
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
9/6/2018 10:01:49 AM
Creation date
9/6/2018 9:57:43 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
BOCC
Date
8/25/2014
Meeting Type
Regular Meeting
Document Type
Agenda
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
257
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
<br /> Comprehensive Review of <br /> S olid W aste Collection and Disposal Options <br /> <br /> <br />v2.1 175 10/22/12 <br />12.6.2 M inimum Waste Throughput Processing Capacity <br />12.6.2.1 Waste-to-Energy <br />As depicted in Exhibit 12-2 in Section 12.3.3 above, WTE facilities require significant waste <br />throughput to be economically viable. For traditional WTE technologies, SCS typically projects <br />a daily throughput capacity of at least 100 to 300 tons per day required to substantiate siting a <br />new WTE facility. Such a facility would most likely consist of multiple, smaller capacity <br />modules, on the order of 250 to 100 tons per day or, several smaller facilities located in different <br />areas, and in both cases providing an aggregate capacity. Collaboration and regionalization is a <br />must to support such technologies. <br /> <br />12.6.2.2 Waste Conversion <br />Based on SCS experience, typical WC technologies, including thermal, biological, and <br />bio-chemical are represented to operate on a comparatively smaller scale. Between these types, <br />generally, thermal technologies require more significant waste throughput to be economically <br />viable. Due to lesser equipment and energy requirements, biological technologies can generally <br />support smaller waste throughput. <br />12.6.2.2.1 Thermal <br />By a wide margin, the greatest amount of recent activity in WC technology is with the thermal <br />technologies, dominated by the plasma arc conversion process. This is mainly due to its <br />potential for large power production and overall reduced air emissions. <br /> <br />The lack of an operational track record for both large-scale and small-scale WC technologies <br />suggests to SCS that a WC technology plant should more likely be planned initially as a small <br />pilot-plant. A pilot plant, in SCS’s opinion, based on proven laboratory and mini-pilot scale <br />technology, would be no more than about 100 tons per day with the potential for scale-up should <br />the technology be proven at the pilot stage and with regional collaboration. <br /> <br />The point here being, based on SCS’s experience, the scalability of thermal WC technologies <br />may never exceed pilot scale without regional collaboration and population growth in Chapel <br />Hill. <br />12.6.2.2.2 Anaerobic Facilities <br />In Europe, the anaerobic process has been used successfully to process MSW. The sizes of these <br />plants reportedly range from 3,000 tons per year (TPY) to 182,000 TPY. Converted to a daily <br />capacity, and assuming a 6-day per week processing schedule, these capacities range from 10 <br />tons per day to 580 tons per day. <br /> <br />As noted in the paragraphs above, there are several operating AD facilities in North America in <br />the size range potentially generated by the Town. These facilities are successfully processing <br />from about 15 to 250 tons per day of food and yard wastes diverted from residences, restaurants <br />and businesses and converted into methane that is used to produce power.
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.