Orange County NC Website
<br /> Comprehensive Review of <br /> S olid W aste Collection and Disposal Options <br /> <br /> <br />v2.1 144 10/22/12 <br />10.4 OTHER CONSIDERATIONS <br />10.4.1 Long -T erm Tip Fee and Mileage Analysis <br />With this particular disposal option analysis, SCS has identified the majority of public and <br />private landfill facilities in the region and summarized their respective disposal fees and <br />distances from the Town. With these data and algorithms inherent to the Pro Forma modeling <br />tool, SCS and the Town may easily and efficiently assess the various long-haul disposal options <br />applicable to a number of other disposal option scenarios being evaluated with this Study. Most <br />notably, should the Town consider siting and constructing a Town-operated transfer station or <br />MRF, thus consolidating the Town waste for bulk shipment out-of-county to one of these <br />identified facilities, this analysis is readily implemented to assess the full, life-cycle cost of the <br />various ultimate landfill disposal options. <br />10.4.2 Disposal Option Sustainability Analysis <br />Like the alternate short-term disposal option evaluated of direct hauling MSW to a transfer <br />station, several other factors weigh into the longer term evaluation of this disposal option of <br />direct hauling to a landfill. These considerations are not as readily quantified with respect to <br />fiscal impact since they relate to risk management, environmental impacts, and socio-economic <br />issues. However, these factors have the potential to create financial implications and indeed <br />resonate with the Town’s stated values and goals and must be considered along with the financial <br />evaluation. Several of the more decisive factors include: <br /> Safety of the Town solid waste collections staff hauling waste even longer distances <br />and over more heavily traveled roadways compared to the distance to Durham; <br /> Increased risk to other motorists due to hauling waste longer distances and over more <br />heavily traveled roadways; <br /> A desire to manage Town-generated waste internally and not having to rely on a <br />neighboring disposal system, and a loss of control over ultimate disposal and costs; <br />and, <br /> A potential loss of focus on Town waste reduction goals. <br />10.5 CONCLUSIONS AND RECO M M ENDATIONS <br />The results of SCS’s analysis of this disposal option concluded that direct haul to available <br />existing landfill facilities did not provide any economic advantages over direct hauling to <br />identified existing transfer station facilities. Therefore, in consideration of short-term disposal <br />option analysis, direct haul to a transfer station facility remains the recommended solution for the <br />Town. <br />