Orange County NC Website
<br /> Comprehensive Review of <br /> S olid W aste Collection and Disposal Options <br /> <br /> <br />v2.1 140 10/22/12 <br />10.2 SCENARIO MODELING AN ALYSIS <br />Like the short-term disposal option of direct hauling to a transfer station, the scenario modeling <br />analyses of this short-term disposal option were structured to result in the least impact to the <br />current level of service that Town customers receive and the least disruption to existing Town <br />collections systems, personnel and equipment; while also providing sufficient collection capacity <br />to enable Town vehicles to make a single trip to the target landfill per day. Furthermore, the <br />various scenarios within this analysis include program modifications that are anticipated to <br />reflect changes in equipment, personnel, and routing over time (e.g., scheduled fleet replacement, <br />inflation, and population growth, etc.). <br />For this MSW disposal option of direct hauling to an existing transfer station, the analysis <br />incorporates the allocated equipment and labor waste collections resources provided in the <br />Town‘s FY 2012-13 budget. The routing configurations, labor, and equipment are allocated such <br />that each residential collections crew can collect along its dedicated route, transport, and <br />generally dispose one (1) load at the Orange County Landfill within the workday. This analysis <br />recognized that a few Town vehicles make a second trip along a limited number of routes. The <br />commercial collections crew usually accomplishes disposal of two loads at the Landfill per day. <br />The evaluation of the direct haul scenarios is structured to enable the residential and commercial <br />crews to avoid having to complete multiple trips to the target landfills. <br />Other relevant assumptions critical to this direct haul to a landfill analysis are identical to those <br />made with SCS’s evaluation of direct hauling MSW to a target transfer station facility. Detailed <br />discussions of these assumptions are presented in Section 6 and include: <br /> Collections Fleet Modifications and Capital Expenditures <br />- Compliance with NCDOT Overweight Regulations <br />- Systematic Replacement of Single-axle vehicles with Tandem-axle vehicles <br />- Assumed the Town’s budgeted annual capital expense for previous equipment <br />replacement as provided = $311,000 per year <br /> Existing Fleet Summary and Projected Replacement Schedule <br />- Seven (7) Residential routes <br />- Two (2) Commercial routes <br />- Seven (7) year vehicle replacement schedule initiating with existing vehicle age <br /> Fleet Modifications <br />- Scheduled replacement of existing Residential rear loader vehicles with <br />tandem-axle 18 to 20 cubic yard vehicles according to the 7-year schedule. <br />Larger capacity vehicles (25 cubic yard) can be utilized as well. Next scheduled <br />replacement FY 2012-13. <br />- Annual amortization cost according to a 7-year amortization schedule and 4% <br />financing rate <br />- No modifications to Commercial collections fleet <br /> Routing Modifications <br />- Evaluated adding one (1) additional Residential route, resulting in a total of seven <br />(7) routes. Equipped with an existing, stand-by collection vehicle. <br />- One (1) additional 3-man crew for this seventh route