Browse
Search
SWAG agenda 082514
OrangeCountyNC
>
Advisory Boards and Commissions - Active
>
Solid Waste Advisory Group
>
Agendas
>
2014
>
SWAG agenda 082514
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
9/6/2018 10:01:49 AM
Creation date
9/6/2018 9:57:43 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
BOCC
Date
8/25/2014
Meeting Type
Regular Meeting
Document Type
Agenda
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
257
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
<br /> Comprehensive Review of <br /> S olid W aste Collection and Disposal Options <br /> <br />v2.1 137 10/22/12 <br />10.0 DISPOSAL OPTION – DIRECT HAUL TO OUT -OF- <br />COUNTY LANDFILL <br />Similar to the disposal option scenario of direct hauling Town-generated MSW to an existing <br />transfer station as discussed in Section 6 above, SCS evaluated the option of direct hauling <br />Town-generated MSW to an existing landfill facility for disposal using the Town-owned <br />collection vehicles. Like the transfer station option, this scenario was deemed to be one of the <br />more reasonable options for short-term implementation if determined to be economically viable. <br />SCS’s methodology, assumptions, and analysis are presented as follows. <br />SCS conducted a survey of permitted public and private landfill facilities in the vicinity of the <br />Town and identified appropriate target facilities within a reasonable distance from the Town. <br />With this evaluation, SCS considered the following variables and inputs to determine the lowest <br />cost disposal option: <br /> Type of facility (i.e., MSW, CDD, yard waste, etc.); <br /> Hauling distance; <br /> Disposal tipping fees; <br /> Average daily throughput of the facility; <br /> Collection and transportation fleet fuel and maintenance costs; <br /> Fleet modifications or upgrades; and, <br /> Labor and collections routing modifications. <br />10.1 IDENTIFIED TARGET LA NDFILL FACILITIES <br />SCS reviewed several published resources to develop a list of viable target landfills for this <br />direct haul evaluation including the “Directory of Non-hazardous Waste Sites-2011” compiled <br />by the Waste Business Journal and cross-referenced to the listing of solid waste facilities <br />currently permitted by NCDENR. The Waste Business Journal Directory provided an <br />electronically sortable list of facilities for North Carolina and surrounding states which included <br />pertinent information such as: <br /> Facility type (i.e., landfill, transfer station, MRF, etc.); <br /> Facility address; <br /> Owner/Operator description (i.e., public or private); <br /> Contact information; <br /> Facility permit number; <br /> Daily average throughput (tons per day); <br /> Permitted and remaining capacities; and, <br /> Tipping fees. <br /> <br />Using these reference sources, a compilation of existing permitted landfills in North Carolina and <br />Virginia was developed along with the estimated driving distance to each facility from a <br />predetermined location presumed to be the geographic center of the Town, which coincides with
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.