Browse
Search
SWAG agenda 082514
OrangeCountyNC
>
Advisory Boards and Commissions - Active
>
Solid Waste Advisory Group
>
Agendas
>
2014
>
SWAG agenda 082514
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
9/6/2018 10:01:49 AM
Creation date
9/6/2018 9:57:43 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
BOCC
Date
8/25/2014
Meeting Type
Regular Meeting
Document Type
Agenda
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
257
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
<br /> Comprehensive Review of <br /> S olid W aste Collection and Disposal Options <br /> <br />v2.1 130 10/22/12 <br />being recycled under the County’s existing and planned recycling programs and thereby increase <br />the quantities of waste that are required to be transferred to disposal facilities. <br /> <br />In the same manner, it is recommended that the Town also consider the concept of co-locating a <br />composting facility in conjunction with a new transfer station that could be utilized to increase <br />organics diversion rates. <br /> <br />Examples of existing MSW transfer station facilities that having some degree of recycling or <br />composting capabilities (in other words, a standard MSW transfer station that is essentially “co- <br />located” with a composting/vegetative waste facility or has “MRF-like” capabilities such as a <br />baler, sorter, or anything else to enable recovery and processing of recyclables) are noted below: <br /> <br /> Recology Hay Road Composting/MRF in Dixon, CA <br /> Recology Yubb-Sutter Composting/MRF in Marysville, CA <br /> Community Waste Disposal in Dallas, TX <br /> Frederick County, MD <br /> Ocean City, MD <br /> Island County, WA <br /> <br />9.1.2.1 Sizing an Appropriate Facility <br />Hypothetical transfer station MRF and transfer station/composting facility dimensions and waste <br />throughput quantities were developed based on a number of assumptions regarding the maximum <br />daily waste acceptance rates for MSW, recyclables, and vegetative wastes, facility configuration, <br />traffic flow patterns, and setbacks to the property line from the transfer station building footprint. <br /> <br />As noted in Section 7, assuming MSW collection occurs 4 days per week, 52 weeks per year, the <br />daily MSW throughput quantities for a Town-only facility range from 75 tons per day (tpd) in <br />FY 2014-15 to approximately 100 tpd in FY 2033-34. <br /> <br /> If the Town of Chapel Hill decides to construct a transfer station that incorporates a <br />MRF to accommodate their MSW generation plus an area for processing and storing <br />recyclables for the next 20 years, the facility should be sized to manage 150 tpd. <br /> Based on SCS’s experience, a transfer station/MRF sized to handle 150 tpd of MSW <br />and recyclables will require a building footprint in the 13,500 sf range, situated on a <br />site pad of at least 2.5 acres within a total property parcel size equal to 5 acres to <br />accommodate site access, truck queuing, and turning radius. <br />The Town currently collects approximately 2,500 tons per year of yard waste, which is <br />anticipated to escalate to nearly 3,400 tons per year over the next 20 years. <br /> <br /> If the Town of Chapel Hill decides to construct a transfer station that incorporates a <br />vegetative waste composting facility to accommodate their MSW generation plus an <br />area for processing and composting organic wastes for the next 20 years, the facility <br />should be sized to manage 140 tpd.
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.