SWAG agenda 082514 - Laserfiche WebLink

Browse Search

Comprehensive Review of S olid W aste Collection and Disposal Options v2.1 124 10/22/12 including the monitoring statistics referenced above. Note problems and corrective actions, to demonstrate the program staff has a handle on the program and are making sure it is on track and as efficient and effective as possible. 8.4 CONCLUSIONS AND RECO MMENDATIONS During review and analysis of the Town budget for this Comprehensive Study, these analyses indicated the Town currently does not directly charge its residents for solid waste disposal. Reimbursement to the Town for SWSD costs incurred for residential solid waste management is understood to be included in the Town’s general tax base. However, some direct revenue is allocated to the SWSD program through Commercial collections, collection cart sales, bulk waste and white goods collection, and customer fines. With the results of this PAYT analysis, the Town may begin to consider allocating the costs of its SWSD residential waste collection services, or a portion thereof, directly to its customers in accordance with the above suggested rates. In consideration of the current SWSD management structure, existing collections equipment and resources, collections practices, and an understanding of the Town culture; if the Town is inclined to reallocate these costs from the general tax base directly to its residents, this analysis indicates that a hybrid PAYT program would likely be the most appropriate approach. In consideration of a hybrid program, a Subscribed Can and Bag, or Subscribed Can and Tag program are most applicable to the Town for the following reasons:  Of all the PAYT program options, a hybrid program presents the easiest transition to PAYT programs from more traditional solid waste financing methods.  The majority of Town residents currently use appropriate cans (i.e., 64-gallon carts) and the Town maintains an existing inventory, maintenance, replacement, and billing system to issue new cans and/or replace damaged cans.  The Town currently utilizes semi-automatic collection vehicles to service the cans. Thus implementation of a dedicated bag or tag only system is not appropriate.  Robust recycling and yard waste programs are currently engaged throughout the Town program and accordingly the Town currently achieves commendable solid waste diversion statistics. Thus the inherent incentives towards greater diversion promoted by other PAYT methods are not deemed to be a significant driver for PAYT implementation.  The Town currently shares a majority of the costs to implementing solid waste services without directly encumbering its residents. Similarly, Town residents appreciate the solid waste service they receive and if asked, are likely willing to pay directly for a portion of this service if it would not impact the level of service. A hybrid PAYT method would promote a smoother transition to such cost sharing versus other methods.