Browse
Search
SWAG agenda 082514
OrangeCountyNC
>
Advisory Boards and Commissions - Active
>
Solid Waste Advisory Group
>
Agendas
>
2014
>
SWAG agenda 082514
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
9/6/2018 10:01:49 AM
Creation date
9/6/2018 9:57:43 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
BOCC
Date
8/25/2014
Meeting Type
Regular Meeting
Document Type
Agenda
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
257
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
<br /> Comprehensive Review of <br /> S olid W aste Collection and Disposal Options <br /> <br /> <br />v2.1 73 10/22/12 <br /> Contract terms prescribe that the municipality pays the private company a contract fee <br />for collection and disposal. Reimbursement to the municipality, if sought, is assessed <br />through solid waste service fees applied to its residents and customers, or through tax <br />assessments. <br />5.2.2 Solid Waste Collections Franchise <br />A solid waste collections and disposal franchise arrangement is very similar to a contract <br />arrangement with the exception that the private sector contractor providing the service would <br />invoice and collect payments from the residents and business customers in the community for <br />solid waste services and pay the municipality a franchise fee. Costs for solid waste services are <br />thus removed from the municipal ledger. Accordingly, the corresponding tax assessment for <br />solid waste services would typically be adjusted. Compared to a contract arrangement, under the <br />franchise arrangement, municipal government is even further removed from the management of <br />solid waste services, thus having even less control over the service and value provided by the <br />vendor. <br />5.2.3 General and Town -Specific Contract Considerations <br />The structuring of an outsourcing contract can have broad implications towards the level of <br />service a contractor may provide, integrating a municipality’s values and goals with the <br />contractor’s services, and hedging challenges inherent to managing the contract. Examples of <br />typical contract terms and structure relevant to the Town are provided below for consideration <br />should the Town consider outsourcing its solid waste services. <br /> Contract Term. Typically 5 to 10 year duration. Shorter durations typically result in <br />higher bid or negotiated costs. <br /> Contract Renewal. Typically 1 to 3 years. An “Evergreen” term implements and <br />automatic renewal unless contract termination is specifically initiated by one (1) of <br />the parties. <br /> Waste Diversion Requirements. Establishing a waste diversion goal in the contract, <br />potentially subject to a penalty or reduced fee, would assure the Town continues to <br />strive towards State and local mandated goals. <br /> Performance Standards. Like the diversion requirement, establishing clear <br />performance standards, and relative penalties or liquidated damages will help the <br />Town manage and maintain the level of service its residents and Town management <br />may expect from a contractor. <br /> Vehicle Requirements. Prescribing vehicle requirements (e.g., new vehicles, <br />maintenance schedules, etc.) attempt to offset service impacts from equipment failure. <br />In addition, prescribing well maintained vehicles promotes a shared commitment to <br />community pride. Furthermore, if applicable, requiring compressed natural gas <br />(CNG) vehicles or electric vehicles can promote a municipality’s commitment to <br />environmental/ “green” initiatives.
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.