Browse
Search
JAC agenda 030218
OrangeCountyNC
>
Advisory Boards and Commissions - Active
>
Justice Advisory Council
>
Agendas
>
2018
>
JAC agenda 030218
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
9/4/2018 3:05:04 PM
Creation date
9/4/2018 3:01:40 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
BOCC
Date
3/2/2018
Meeting Type
Regular Meeting
Document Type
Agenda
Document Relationships
JAC minutes 030218
(Message)
Path:
\Advisory Boards and Commissions - Active\Justice Advisory Council\Minutes\2018
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
39
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
<br /> <br />NORTH CAROLINA POVERTY RESEARCH FUND 4 <br />Court Fines and Fees: Criminalizing Poverty in North Carolina <br />disabled, or suffers from mental illness or addiction. <br /> <br />Similarly, when a person is arrested on a minor offense like trespassing, marijuana, <br />disorderly conduct—or someone has failed to appear in court, a bond is required. For <br />many a $500 bond might as well be $5 million. They are held, not because they are a <br />danger to the community, but because they are poor. Jail becomes “debtor’s prison.”3 <br /> <br />We outlawed debtor’s prisons in the United States in the 19th century. In North Carolina, we even wrote <br />the prohibition into our constitution: “There shall be no imprisonment for debt in this State.”4 <br /> <br /> ************************* <br /> <br />The due process and equal protection clauses of the Fourteenth Amendment prohibit states from <br />“punishing a person for his poverty.”5 Though the rule seems to be accepted in theory, in practice it is <br />violated across North Carolina and much of the country on a routine, and increasing, basis. This report is <br />the first in a series of six to be issued by the North Carolina Poverty Research Fund exploring a broad <br />array of state criminal justice practices that work to criminalize poverty. As a result, they deny <br />constitutional principle, cast pervasive doubt upon the openness and fundamental fairness of our courts, <br />demean the independence and professionalism of our judges, crush the dignity and life prospects of many <br />low-income Tar Heels, and seek to shift the responsibility for funding an effective, accurate and impartial <br />system of justice from the broad citizenry to an unlikely cohort of the most economically distressed North <br />Carolinians. Most fundamentally, the practices deploy the power of the state to sanction, or to increase <br />punishments, simply because the defendants are poor. <br /> <br /> <br />Fines and Fees in North Carolina <br /> <br />Fines and fees are among the monetary sanctions, sometimes referred to as legal financial obligations, <br />courts impose on criminal defendants. Fines are levied as the punishment for breaking a law. Fees are <br />meant to generate revenue and are used to fund the courts and other government activities. In North <br />Carolina and elsewhere, fees attach to every step of the criminal justice process. On top of fines and fees, <br />defendants may be ordered to pay restitution to the victim and, in some states, additional surcharges. <br /> <br />The sharp rise of fines and fees in recent years—and the enormous number of people who owe them—has <br />given the topic a new urgency. Since 2010, at least 48 states have increased court fees, added new ones, <br />or both.6 It is estimated that about 80-85% of inmates leave prison owing court-imposed costs.7 In North <br />Carolina, fees have increased 400% over the past twenty years.8 <br /> <br />Fees are defined by North Carolina statute. One of the most common is the General Court of Justice fee, <br />which is assessed against all defendants in criminal court (including traffic infractions) who plead guilty <br />or are convicted. The fee is $147.50 for cases in district court and $154.50 in superior court. Other fees <br />accompany the General Court of Justice fee and all together a defendant can expect to pay a minimum fee <br /> <br />3 Morey, “When Traffic Court Becomes Debtors’ Prison.” <br />4 North Carolina Constitution, Article I, Section 28. <br />5 Bearden v. Georgia, 461 U.S. 660, 671 (1983). <br />6 Shapiro, “As Court Fees Rise, the Poor Are Paying the Price.” <br />7 Shapiro. <br />8 Gordon, “His Sentence Carried No Jail Time. So Why Did He Keep Ending Up There?”
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.