Orange County NC Website
<br /> <br />NORTH CAROLINA POVERTY RESEARCH FUND 4 <br />Court Fines and Fees: Criminalizing Poverty in North Carolina <br />disabled, or suffers from mental illness or addiction. <br /> <br />Similarly, when a person is arrested on a minor offense like trespassing, marijuana, <br />disorderly conduct—or someone has failed to appear in court, a bond is required. For <br />many a $500 bond might as well be $5 million. They are held, not because they are a <br />danger to the community, but because they are poor. Jail becomes “debtor’s prison.”3 <br /> <br />We outlawed debtor’s prisons in the United States in the 19th century. In North Carolina, we even wrote <br />the prohibition into our constitution: “There shall be no imprisonment for debt in this State.”4 <br /> <br /> ************************* <br /> <br />The due process and equal protection clauses of the Fourteenth Amendment prohibit states from <br />“punishing a person for his poverty.”5 Though the rule seems to be accepted in theory, in practice it is <br />violated across North Carolina and much of the country on a routine, and increasing, basis. This report is <br />the first in a series of six to be issued by the North Carolina Poverty Research Fund exploring a broad <br />array of state criminal justice practices that work to criminalize poverty. As a result, they deny <br />constitutional principle, cast pervasive doubt upon the openness and fundamental fairness of our courts, <br />demean the independence and professionalism of our judges, crush the dignity and life prospects of many <br />low-income Tar Heels, and seek to shift the responsibility for funding an effective, accurate and impartial <br />system of justice from the broad citizenry to an unlikely cohort of the most economically distressed North <br />Carolinians. Most fundamentally, the practices deploy the power of the state to sanction, or to increase <br />punishments, simply because the defendants are poor. <br /> <br /> <br />Fines and Fees in North Carolina <br /> <br />Fines and fees are among the monetary sanctions, sometimes referred to as legal financial obligations, <br />courts impose on criminal defendants. Fines are levied as the punishment for breaking a law. Fees are <br />meant to generate revenue and are used to fund the courts and other government activities. In North <br />Carolina and elsewhere, fees attach to every step of the criminal justice process. On top of fines and fees, <br />defendants may be ordered to pay restitution to the victim and, in some states, additional surcharges. <br /> <br />The sharp rise of fines and fees in recent years—and the enormous number of people who owe them—has <br />given the topic a new urgency. Since 2010, at least 48 states have increased court fees, added new ones, <br />or both.6 It is estimated that about 80-85% of inmates leave prison owing court-imposed costs.7 In North <br />Carolina, fees have increased 400% over the past twenty years.8 <br /> <br />Fees are defined by North Carolina statute. One of the most common is the General Court of Justice fee, <br />which is assessed against all defendants in criminal court (including traffic infractions) who plead guilty <br />or are convicted. The fee is $147.50 for cases in district court and $154.50 in superior court. Other fees <br />accompany the General Court of Justice fee and all together a defendant can expect to pay a minimum fee <br /> <br />3 Morey, “When Traffic Court Becomes Debtors’ Prison.” <br />4 North Carolina Constitution, Article I, Section 28. <br />5 Bearden v. Georgia, 461 U.S. 660, 671 (1983). <br />6 Shapiro, “As Court Fees Rise, the Poor Are Paying the Price.” <br />7 Shapiro. <br />8 Gordon, “His Sentence Carried No Jail Time. So Why Did He Keep Ending Up There?”