Browse
Search
Agenda - 09-06-2018 Item 3 - Discussion on Proposed Nonprofit Capital Funding Policy and Criteria
OrangeCountyNC
>
Board of County Commissioners
>
BOCC Agendas
>
2010's
>
2018
>
Agenda - 09-06-2018 Work Session
>
Agenda - 09-06-2018 Item 3 - Discussion on Proposed Nonprofit Capital Funding Policy and Criteria
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/31/2018 3:42:09 PM
Creation date
8/31/2018 3:40:54 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
BOCC
Date
9/6/2018
Meeting Type
Work Session
Document Type
Agenda
Agenda Item
3
Document Relationships
Agenda - 09-06-2018 Work Session
(Message)
Path:
\Board of County Commissioners\BOCC Agendas\2010's\2018\Agenda - 09-06-2018 Work Session
Minutes 09-06-2018 Work Session
(Message)
Path:
\Board of County Commissioners\Minutes - Approved\2010's\2018
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
24
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
W- <br />SanfordHolshouser <br />www.Sanfordholshouserlaw.com <br />commensurate with the size of the grant. Because County money would be the <br />intended source for the payment of the construction costs, the construction of the <br />building would likely be subject to the construction and bid laws otherwise applicable to <br />County projects. <br />Make a multi -year grant that could be used for lease or loan payments <br />The outside agency would contract for a capital project, and the County would <br />enter a multi -year grant agreement that was sized to provide for the agency's lease or <br />loan payments related to the project. <br />Fund a loan -loss reserve to back loans to the outside agencies. <br />As the County has done with its business loan programs, the County could fund a <br />loan -loss reserve to support loans incurred by the outside agencies. <br />Considerations for all approaches <br />The function to be served by the outside agency must be a function the County is <br />authorized to provide directly. <br />Each arrangement should be supported by a contract with the outside agency <br />that specifies the work to be done by the agency. If the County uses a multi -year grant <br />approach, then the contract should extend for the term of the grant. If the County uses <br />a lease approach, then the performance contract should extend for the term of the <br />lease. There should in all events be some level of proportionality between the funding <br />from the County and the service by the agency. <br />In undertaking any program of this sort, the County should build a strong record <br />documenting the public benefit expected from the arrangement. To the extent the <br />County views the project and benefitting agencies as enhancing employment and <br />business prospects in the County, the County would be well- served to also follow the <br />statutory procedures (including public hearings) provided for in the business incentive <br />statutes. <br />* * * * * * * * * * * * * ** <br />Please let me know if you have any questions for me. <br />Thanks, as always. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.