Browse
Search
Agenda item 2 - Additional Discussion Regarding the Election Method for Members of the Orange County Board of Commissioners
OrangeCountyNC
>
BOCC Archives
>
Agendas
>
Agendas
>
2018
>
Agenda - 09-06-2018 Work Session
>
Agenda item 2 - Additional Discussion Regarding the Election Method for Members of the Orange County Board of Commissioners
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/31/2018 3:37:00 PM
Creation date
8/31/2018 3:32:07 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
BOCC
Date
9/6/2018
Meeting Type
Work Session
Document Type
Agenda
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
32
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
The Board then pursued a series of meetings over the next thirteen months, including public <br />hearings, Board discussions on possible draft district maps /plans for either a five or seven - <br />member Board, and decisions on specific map /plan issues. <br />The public hearings and discussions led to the development of a map /plan (identified in 2006 as <br />"Proposal D ") for a seven - member board that met all statutory requirements. The County <br />Attorney prepared a draft resolution calling for a November 2006 referendum in concert with <br />"Proposal D ", and the Board approved that resolution and the election plan /map at its June 27, <br />2006 regular meeting in preparation for a voter referendum as required by the North Carolina <br />General Statutes. The approved resolution and election map /plan are provided at Attachment <br />A. The population deviations for the approved 2006 map /plan, based on the 2000 Census, are <br />provided at Attachment B. <br />In the November 2006 referendum, the voters subsequently approved the election plan /map <br />with more than two - thirds supporting the initiative. The election plan /map was implemented with <br />the May 2008 primary election and all seven members of the current Board have since qualified <br />and been elected under the plan. <br />The election plan /map approved in 2006 established a district/at large system for electing seven <br />members of the Board of Commissioners, and includes two nominating districts. <br />• Three seats on the Board are filled, with staggered four -year terms, by individuals <br />residing in District 1 and nominated by the voters in District 1 during the primary election. <br />These district - nominated candidates are then elected by all the voters in the entire <br />County during the general election. <br />• Two seats on the Board are filled, with staggered four -year terms, by individuals residing <br />in District 2 and nominated by the voters in District 2 during the primary election. These <br />district - nominated candidates are then elected by all the voters in the entire County <br />during the general election. <br />• The other two other seats on the Board are filled, with staggered four -year terms, by <br />individuals residing anywhere in the County and nominated by all voters in the County <br />during the primary election. These "at large" candidates are then elected by all the <br />voters in the entire County during the general election. <br />In summary, five district seats on the Board are filled based on district residency and district <br />nomination during the primary election, followed by countywide election in the general election. <br />The two at large seats are filled based on countywide nomination and countywide election. <br />REVIEW OF DISTRICT ELECTIONS MAP BASED ON 2010 CENSUS <br />Final numbers for the 2010 Census were published in 2011 providing new population numbers <br />for Orange County as a whole as well as for the two current electoral districts. North Carolina <br />General Statute 153A -22 states, "If a county is divided into electoral districts for the purpose of <br />nominating or electing persons to the board of commissioners, the board of commissioners may <br />find as a fact whether there is substantial inequality of population among the districts." <br />Population growth or decline in districts can lead to significant deviations in the numbers of <br />residents between districts, thereby compromising the integrity of the districts and the election <br />plan as a whole. Therefore the Board may, but is not required to, review the impact of the new <br />Census numbers to determine if there is substantial inequality. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.