Browse
Search
Agenda item 2 - Additional Discussion Regarding the Election Method for Members of the Orange County Board of Commissioners
OrangeCountyNC
>
BOCC Archives
>
Agendas
>
Agendas
>
2018
>
Agenda - 09-06-2018 Work Session
>
Agenda item 2 - Additional Discussion Regarding the Election Method for Members of the Orange County Board of Commissioners
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/31/2018 3:37:00 PM
Creation date
8/31/2018 3:32:07 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
BOCC
Date
9/6/2018
Meeting Type
Work Session
Document Type
Agenda
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
32
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
32 <br />Chair Dorosin said a fair voting system does not mean that everyone gets to elect <br />whomever they want. He said if the minority is small enough, it will not be able to overcome <br />the majority. He said the question is whether or not the system is created fairly. <br />Commissioner Marcoplos agreed, and said the point of cumulative voting is that <br />everyone has a chance. He said in general elections the Commissioners are usually an <br />afterthought, since people vote their party. <br />Commissioner Marcoplos said for a Republican to win, he /she must appeal on the <br />issues across the County. He said if the County moved to having just two districts, and no at- <br />large positions, break down might be five commissioners in district 1, and 2 in district 2; based <br />on population. He said this would make residents in the rural part of the County very upset. <br />Commissioner Marcoplos asked if the legislature was asked to consider cumulative <br />voting for Orange County, would it give a yes or no answer. <br />Commissioner Jacobs said, if invited in, the legislature could change it to whatever it <br />pleased, as seen in Greensboro and Wake County. <br />Commissioner Jacobs referred to the issue of independent voters, and said this is an <br />increasingly larger group. He said the BOCC should gather more information on this group. <br />He said he is more interested in finding out how to get these people to run, than he is in <br />messing with the districts. He said candidates should run on issues. <br />Chair Dorosin asked John Roberts if having non - partisan elections would require <br />legislative approval. <br />John Roberts said yes. <br />Commissioner Price referred to Commissioner Jacobs' comments, and said in other <br />states one has to be registered with a party to vote in a primary. <br />Commissioner McKee said he just wanted to tweak the system, not to change it. He <br />said he believes it is a perception problem, rather than a real problem. He said it has been <br />over a hundred years since a republican was elected in Orange County. He said anyone who <br />is elected to the BOCC, and tries to be a disruptive force, will find themselves up against other <br />Commissioners who will not put up with it. He said any changes that are made should be <br />those that can be made in house, and not involve the legislature. <br />Commissioner McKee said his intent is to alleviate the perception of inequity. He said <br />he does not believe there really is much inequity, but there is the perception of such. <br />Chair Dorosin summarized the discussion: <br />• Two ideas that require legislative approval, and BOCC would like more information: <br />cumulative and non - partisan voting <br />• District nominate /district election- <br />• Get rid of at large positions- and have two districts <br />• More information on voter registrations in district <br />• Updated census data <br />Greg Wilder said to have all seven seats elected by district, the district lines would need <br />to be redrawn, moving 4,000 people from district 1 to district 2, which would result in four <br />commissioner seats in District 1, and three seats in District 2. <br />Chair Dorosin said his intent was to have two multi- member districts. He said to have <br />seven individual districts would result in pizza slices coming out of Chapel Hill, and some <br />districts would violate other principles of drawing districts, such as having communities of <br />shared interest, etc. He said there could not be district blocks throughout the County, due to <br />the density of the population in certain areas. <br />4. Closed Session - Canceled <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.