Orange County NC Website
Browse       Search
1 <br />2 <br />3 <br />4 <br />5 <br />6 <br />7 <br />8 <br />9 <br />10 <br />11 <br />12 <br />13 <br />14 <br />15 <br />16 <br />17 <br />18 <br />19 <br />20 <br />21 <br />22 <br />23 <br />24 <br />25 <br />26 <br />27 <br />28 <br />29 <br />30 <br />31 <br />32 <br />33 <br />34 <br />35 <br />36 <br />37 <br />38 <br />39 <br />40 <br />41 <br />42 <br />43 <br />44 <br />45 <br />46 <br />47 <br />48 <br />49 <br />14 <br />The Board considered making appointments to the Animal Services Advisory Board <br />(ASAB). <br />Commissioner Jacobs asked if there are specific qualifications that make someone a <br />good fit for the animal welfare advocacy position. <br />Bob Marotto said it is a broad background of people who would qualify. He said there <br />are residents who are animal advocates who work in a variety of settings, and there are also <br />many residents who are actively involved in improving the welfare of animals, such as animal <br />rescue. <br />Chair Dorosin said the Board is going to have a work session in the early fall, where <br />advisory boards will be discussed and the type of reports that are submitted back to the Board. <br />He said there will also be discussion about these special types of boards. <br />A motion was made by Commissioner Rich, seconded by Commissioner Price to <br />appoint the following to the ASAB: <br />• Appointment to a first full term (Position #3) "Town of Carrboro" representative for Dr. <br />Evelyn Daniel expiring 06/30/2021. <br />• Appointment to a first full term (Position #4) "Town of Chapel Hill" representative for <br />Amanda Schwoerke expiring 06/30/2021. <br />VOTE: UNANIMOUS <br />A motion was made by Commissioner Jacobs, seconded by Commissioner Price to fill <br />Position #9- Animal Welfare /Animal Advocacy" with Ms. Hahn. <br />VOTE: UNANIMOUS <br />h. Resolution from Chair Dorosin <br />Chair Dorosin said he has heard from several public school advocates who are <br />extremely concerned about the proposed Senate Bill 75, which will put a referendum on the <br />ballot in November to set a maximum state income tax rate at 5.5 %, which is lower than the <br />current level. He said the concern about this cap is that there will be potentially negative <br />funding impacts across the board, but especially for education, thus putting increased burden <br />on counties. He said the North Carolina Association of County Commissioners (NCACC) is <br />also concerned about this possible bill. He said this type of bill has been passed in other <br />states, and has proven very detrimental to public education funding. <br />A RESOLUTION OPPOSING THE PASSAGE OF SENATE BILL 75 AND THE AMENDMENT <br />OF THE NORTH CAROLINA CONSTITUTION TO PROVIDE THAT THE MAXIMUM TAX <br />RATE ON INCOMES CANNOT EXCEED FIVE AND ONE -HALF PERCENT <br />WHEREAS, on March 14, 2017, the North Carolina Senate passed Senate Bill 75 and sent it to <br />the North Carolina House of Representatives; and <br />WHEREAS, Senate Bill 75, titled "Constitutional Amendment — Maximum Income Tax Rate of <br />5.5 %" would be a referendum added to the 2018 November election to seek change to the <br />state constitution to cap the income tax rate at 5.5 percent should it pass the NC House; and <br />WHEREAS, North Carolina's tax rates are already among the lowest in the nation; and <br />