APB agenda 061902 - Laserfiche WebLink

Browse Search

A MOTION: Kleese moved to forward the recommendation as noted above to the BOCC. Seconded by Walters. VOTE: Unanimous. d. Voluntary Agricultural District Application — Lee Miller Farm (this item moved from Discussion by vote as noted) MOTION: Morrow motioned to add the Lee Miller Farm VAD application to the agenda as a decision item. Seconded by Mandell. VOTE: Unanimous. After a staff review of the application materials the board voted to consider the application for Voluntary Agricultural District status. MOTION: Walters motioned to designate the Lee Miller farm for a VAD and forward to the BOCC. Seconded by Ranells VOTE: Unanimous. ITEM #5: ITEMS FOR DISCUSSION a. VFPPO Update — Draft Stancil noted that staff has worked to explore potential changes to the Voluntary Farmland Preservation Program, originally enacted in 1992, as per previous APB discussions in March. In recent years many changes have occurred in VFPPOs and the status of farming, warranting revisiting the ordinance. Staff has reviewed the ordinances from other jurisdictions, the new model ordinance, and comments from the APB meetings to develop a draft `straw' set of initial suggestions for changes to the program. These suggestions were outlined in the agenda packet. It was noted that Section IV- membership requirements would be considered after we see what the agricultural priority areas look like and the districts are finalized. The members discussed including a ninth duty to Section D- Duties, as per the State Model Ordinance, to develop a countywide farmland preservation plan as defined in NCGS § 106- 744(e)(1) for presentation to the Board of County Commissioners. The need for a map that shows a farmland priority areas was noted as a high priority. Other topics discussed included, possible number of participating VADs, priority areas and possible district definitions, how membership could be affected with more VAD participants, setting up the program to encourage new VADs without enlarging the board membership beyond a reasonable number. A reply from the county attorney on the application form and the Agricultural Conservation Agreement was distributed as a handout. Due to the hour, this discussion was deferred to the next meeting.