Orange County NC Website
5_1 <br />Page 6 farmland preservation report May 2002 <br />News briefs <br />Conlinued from page 5 <br />■■■ <br />have preserved 137,093 acres of farmland expressly for agricultural <br />use in 28 of the state's 58 counties. The report will be published <br />In Virginia ... Virginians will have <br />later this year. <br />the chance to vote for a $119 <br />The data would likely put California in third place in a <br />million parks bond, $30 million <br />nationwide ranking of states if the ranking included land trust acres. <br />would go to acquisition of parkland <br />A state program ranking conducted by Farmland Preservation <br />and natural areas. But of greater <br />potential is a proposal by Gov. <br />Report in April was based on acres reported by state - operated <br />Mark Warner to impose a $5 per <br />purchase of development rights programs. That ranking placed <br />ton tipping fee on solid waste, <br />California ninth based on 15,400 acres preserved through the state's <br />which is estimated to generate $76 <br />million a year, to be dedicated to <br />Farmland Conservancy Program. The remainder of the total <br />environmental programs. Some <br />reported by AIC, 121,693 acres, was protected by land trusts with <br />legislative leaders have endorsed <br />private funds or through donation. <br />the plan, which would send 40 <br />percent of the money to the state's <br />According to author Alvin D. Sokolow, a public policy <br />two open space programs, the <br />specialist in human and community development at UC- Davis, the <br />Virginia Land Conservation <br />aim of the report was to count all acres that are protected by <br />Foundation and the Virginia <br />Outdoors Foundation. A coalition of <br />agricultural conservation easements by organizations targeting <br />land conservation groups, including <br />agricultural lands. Acres protected primarily for open space with <br />the Piedmont Environmental <br />agriculture as a secondary use were excluded, as were acres <br />Council and The Nature <br />Conservancy, has been lobbying <br />protected by organizations whose missions are to protect habitat and <br />for a dedicated source of funding <br />open space for environmenta„ o ecreationaL oses,. . such as The <br />lrrp <br />since .19.99 and found that Virginia <br />.pu Y <br />Nature Conservancy and the Trust for Public Land. <br />needs a minimum -annual'.furid:of. <br />$40 million for land protection. The <br />"Certainly there are thousands of ag acres throughout the state <br />group said the state has 425* <br />covered by easements that don't fit the first category," many located <br />"globally significant conservation <br />in other than the 28 counties in the study, Sokolow said. <br />sites that are unprotected and that <br />the cost of purchasing 30 specific <br />"A part of the distinction is to look at the purposes of <br />top sites would be $20 million. The <br />easement programs" Sokolow said, <br />average per -acre cost of farmland <br />Erik Vink, assistant director of the Department of <br />in the state is $1,925. The coalition <br />stated purchasing easements on 2 <br />Conservation's Division of Land Resource Protection, said he was <br />percent of Virginia's farmland <br />comfortable with the study's results. <br />(170,000 acres) would cost $100 <br />"What [the study] tried to do, which I agree with, is to <br />million if purchased at 30 percent <br />of fair market value. In 1999, a <br />determine what land is being protected for agriculture first and <br />legislative subcommittee <br />foremost ... it has the ring of truth to me as to what is happening <br />recommended $40 million be set <br />out there." <br />aside annually, but the result was a <br />one -year appropriation of $1.75 <br />Vink said there had been a void in documentation of land trust <br />million. The fund did not have the <br />activity pertaining to agriculture. <br />support of then -Gov. Jim Gilmore. <br />"We are in the earl stages, and it's helpful to take an earl <br />Y g p y <br />The state lost 450,000 acres of <br />farmland between 1987 and 1997 <br />look to see if we can learn from our experiences to date." <br />and has nationally important <br />The report includes acres reported by the Sonoma County <br />historic sites threatened by <br />Agricultural and Open Space District, whose activities place the <br />development. <br />In Massachusetts ... A $750 <br />county in the nation's top 10 localities for preserved farmland. Last <br />million bond bill that has been <br />July, Farmland Preservation Report ranked Sonoma County as fifth <br />passed by the Senate still awaits <br />in the nation, with 37,873 acres reported by the district as <br />acfion on the House floor. The fund <br />would provide $45 million to the <br />agricultural lands. But the District's reported total in the AIC report <br />Agricultural Preservation <br />Restriction (APR) program and $15 <br />