Browse
Search
Agenda - 12-04-2000-8i
OrangeCountyNC
>
Board of County Commissioners
>
BOCC Agendas
>
2000's
>
2000
>
Agenda - 12-04-2000
>
Agenda - 12-04-2000-8i
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
9/1/2008 10:46:56 PM
Creation date
8/29/2008 10:17:12 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
BOCC
Date
12/4/2000
Document Type
Agenda
Agenda Item
8i
Document Relationships
Minutes - 12-04-2000
(Linked To)
Path:
\Board of County Commissioners\Minutes - Approved\2000's\2000
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
3
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
2 <br />CONSERVATION TRUST i FOR NORTH CAROLINA <br />TO: County Governments with Farmland Preservation Programs August, 2000 <br />Soil and Water Conservation Districts <br />Qualified, private, nonprofit conservation organizations <br />FRpM: Charles E. Roe, Executive Director <br />Conservation Trust for NC <br />SUBJECT: Guidance to apply far pant award from the North Carolina Departmern of A,gxiculttilre <br />and Consumer 5ervice's Farmland Preservation Program <br />The Conservation Trust far North Carolina is contracted by the N.C. Department of Apiculture and <br />Consumer Services to assist in administering the Farmland Preservation Trust Fund grrant program <br />far fiscal year 2040.01, as for the previous two years. Tk-e N.C. General Assembly in its 2000 session <br />appropriated $1,540,000 to the Farmmland Preservation Trust Fund for the acquisition of permanent <br />agricultural conservation easements for purpose of protecting rural lands, principally used for <br />agricultural purposes, and particularly in the vicinities of urban growth areas and near high-priority <br />waterways and other environmentally sensitive areas. <br />In the two previous years, from total appropriations of 5750,000 in 1998 and 1999, twelve grants wore <br />awarded to qualifiied counties and nonprofit, land conservation organizations to protect parts of twelve <br />faints through acquisition of agricultural conservation easements--both by purchase of non <br />agriailtural development rights (generally by "bargain sales" at considerably less than the appraised <br />values) or by covering transactional expenses for donated conservation easements. <br />Although the N.C. General Assembly has tripled the amount available for farmland preservation grants <br />this year, it is anticipated that many grant requests will be received and few grants will be awarded for <br />large portions of the actual non-agricultural development value of farms, particularly in urban growth <br />fringe areas. The largest single grant award made in 1999 was for $125,000, but the fans owner <br />voluntarily donated the bulk of the non agricultural development value of the farm, which was <br />appraised in excess of 52 million. In 1998 and 1999 the highest match ratio for grar-t awards was 1:1 <br />(SO percent) in which the county provided the balance of the easennent purchase price with local funds. <br />The General Assembly in its 2000 session amended the enabling statute for the North Carolina <br />Farmland Preservation Trust Fund (G.S. 106-744(c)) to establish minimum matching requirements fe7r <br />applicant counties and private, nonprofit conservation organizations. The n~mum amount of gents <br />from the Farmland Preservation Trust Fund far purchase of agricultural conservation easements, <br />including transactional costs, is nvw seventy percent (70%) for nonprofit conservation vrgani~~tions <br />and for counties UNLES5 a courriy has formally adopted a countywide farmland protection plan <br />(defined by the statutory amendment, SEE ATTACHMENT). Note that for those counties that have <br />adopted farmland protection plans, those that aze designated "enterprise tier one, two, ar three" (based <br />on economic criteria) are exempt from any local match requirement; and those counties with a <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.