Browse
Search
060905 Attachment summary
OrangeCountyNC
>
Board of County Commissioners
>
BOCC Agendas
>
2000's
>
2005
>
Agenda - 06-09-2005
>
060905 Attachment summary
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/29/2018 2:37:32 PM
Creation date
8/29/2018 2:36:39 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
BOCC
Date
6/9/2005
Meeting Type
Regular Meeting
Document Type
Agenda
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
5
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Aside from the significant dollar increase in County current expense funding allocated to the <br />school systems, the major difference between'! 986 and the current fiscal environment is funding <br />for capital projects. From the late 1970s up to the 1988 bond referendum there were no concerns <br />related to funding start up costs for new facilities. Capital Investment Programming was a new <br />concept for Orange County government. This issue is significant because fund balance has been <br />the major source of start up costs for new facilities for OCS. The CHCCS has used the district tax <br />as a source for start up costs related to new facilities. This practice could also become an issue if <br />the move toward funding equity gains momentum. The Finance Directors have identified three <br />major issues related to fund balance policy that must be given consideration prior to setting and <br />maintaining concrete fund balance targets. <br />Funding for Start up costs — As mentioned above, OCS has historically used fund balance <br />as a source to pay the one time costs associated with opening new schools and the <br />CHCCS has mainly used district taxes. If concrete fund balance targets are established <br />and adhered to, an alternative source for start up costs would have to be identified for the <br />OCS. Likewise, if the district tax is frozen or reduced and /or eventually eliminated in the <br />pursuit of equity funding, other funding sources would need to be identified. <br />• Emergencies- and- Unforeseen_Events — In addition to cash flow considerations, units of <br />government also use fund balance to handle emergency situations and /or unforeseen <br />events. If fund balance targets are established and followed, a clear statement should be <br />made regarding response to emergencies or unforeseen events. <br />• Use of Fund Balance for Operating Expenditures — This is another policy issue related to <br />use of fund balance. Both school systems have used fund balance to pay for recurring <br />operational initiatives in the past. The most recent example of this is the OCS use of $1.2 <br />million in fund balance in their 2004 -2005 budget to fund several operational initiatives. In <br />addition CHCCS appropriated $1.6 million. Use of fund balance to pay for ongoing <br />operating costs could present funding challenges for these types of expenditures in future <br />years as reserves become scarce. A sound fund balance policy should also address when <br />and under what circumstances fund balance should be considered for funding ongoing <br />operational expenditures <br />As mentioned above, the 1986 memo from Gordon Baker that resulted in the current policy only <br />addressed fund balance as a cash flow tool. The Finance Directors agreed that a sound fund <br />balance policy should be more comprehensive and include not only percentage targets related to <br />the levels required to meet cash flow needs, but also address issues involving the how and when it <br />can be accumulated and used. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.