Browse
Search
031505 Work Session attachment 2
OrangeCountyNC
>
Board of County Commissioners
>
BOCC Agendas
>
2000's
>
2005
>
Agenda - 03-15-2005
>
031505 Work Session attachment 2
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/29/2018 12:32:35 PM
Creation date
8/29/2018 12:29:22 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
BOCC
Date
3/15/2005
Meeting Type
Work Session
Document Type
Agenda
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
5
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Despite the fact that the two OCS middle schools have larger student populations <br />than the four CHCCS middle schools, there are fewer specialists available to work with OCS <br />students, and class size is larger. These distinctions have some import, because it is also at <br />this juncture that the achievement scores of OCS students begin to dip below those of <br />CHCCS students. Whereas reading achievement was somewhat even between the two <br />districts at the elementary level, in middle schools the district scores diverge. <br />Achievement <br />Although reading and mathematics scores for 6th graders dip, they rebound in <br />literacy, though less in OCS than CHCCS. In mathematics where CHCC5 stays constant, <br />OCS scores continue to decline in middle school. Both districts register 95% of their grade <br />5 students at or above grade level on mathematics EOG tests. CHCC5 students level off in <br />the sixth grade at about 93 %, a level sustained through middle school, while OCS students <br />decline steadily in middle school, meeting the statewide level of 85% at the end of eighth <br />grade. These differences are extended into high school with CHCCS getting higher scores <br />on End of Course (EOC) tests in Geometry, Chemistry, Biology, ELPS, History and English. <br />SAT scores for high school students in CHCCS are markedly higher than for OCS; <br />participation rates are substantially higher for CHCC5 as well. <br />Even though high schools in CHCCS have larger populations than in OCS (1740 and <br />1546 to OCS populations of 899 and 948), the ratios of counselors to students in CHCC5, <br />1:250 and 1 :258 are lower than they are in OCS, where they are 1:300 and 1:316. CHCC5 <br />report 35 counselors in total, and 005 report 17. It. is important to note that in many <br />schools counselors assume the responsibility for the scheduling, oversight, and <br />implementation of testing, administrative tasks that take up time that they might be <br />spending with students. This might partially explain why dropout figures reported in 2002- <br />2003 for 9th -12th graders show 5.81% for OCS and .99 for CHCCS. Across the state the <br />percentage is 4.78. NC and CHCCS dropout percentages have been diminishing for the past <br />few years; whereas the 005 rate fluctuates: 5.2% in 2001 -02, 4.22% in 2002 -03, and <br />5.81% in 2003 -04. <br />Both CHCCS and 005 usually out perform the state on EOG achievement test scores <br />across important educational sub - groups (i.e., Male, Female, White, Black, Hispanic, <br />American Indian, Asian /Pacific Islander, Multi- racial, Economically Disadvantaged, Not <br />Economically Disadvantaged, Limited English Proficient, and Students with Disabilities). <br />Both districts have exhibited marked improvement in the EOG scores of their Black and <br />Economically Disadvantaged students at rates greater than the NC rate from 2002 -0303 to <br />2003 -2004. <br />One of the greatest differences between the school districts is the percentage of <br />their students who are categorized as exceptional because of a learning disability, or an <br />emotional or behavioral problem. Although the total student population of OCS is 40% <br />fewer than CHCC5, its population of students with disabilities is 12% larger: 1,138 (or 17.6% <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.