Browse
Search
ORC minutes 090617
OrangeCountyNC
>
Advisory Boards and Commissions - Active
>
Orange County Planning Board
>
Ordinance Review Committee
>
Minutes
>
2017
>
ORC minutes 090617
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/29/2018 11:51:25 AM
Creation date
8/29/2018 11:51:16 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
BOCC
Meeting Type
Regular Meeting
Document Type
Agenda
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
11
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Approved 10/4/17 <br /> <br />2 <br />Tony Blake asked if the effect of this proposed amendment would be on management practices as in not needing to have a 53 <br />water garden or something of the like. 54 <br /> 55 <br />Allison Reinert said that this refers to Best Management Practices, stormwater control measures – 56 <br /> 57 <br />Tony Blake asked if all of that is going away. 58 <br /> 59 <br />Allison Reinert said that yes, as long as the developer can still meet the quantity rules. 60 <br /> 61 <br />Tony Blake asked if the quantity rules have changed. 62 <br /> 63 <br />Allison Reinert replied that they have not changed but that some developers need to retain some of the water so there is not 64 <br />too much over land flow and other stormwater retention features. 65 <br /> 66 <br />Tony Blake commented that runoff issues would still be considered. 67 <br /> 68 <br />Allison Reinert confirmed this. 69 <br /> 70 <br />Tony Blake thanked her for the clarification. 71 <br /> 72 <br />Allison Reinert continued going over the proposed changes to the UDO. She said that another change is to get rid of section I 73 <br />as there is no Jordan Water Nutrient Supply Strategy because it is directly correlated to the nutrient rules. 74 <br /> 75 <br />Randy Marshall said that he presumed that Orange County has stormwater regulations. A part from anything related to Jordan 76 <br />Lake, are regulations related to Jordan Lake proposed to be more or less restrictive than what we already have? 77 <br /> 78 <br />Allison Reinert replied that the current UDO language is more restrictive and since the County cannot be more restrictive than 79 <br />the state on this matter, the current language needs to be changed. 80 <br /> 81 <br />Randy Marshall followed-up by asking if the County could not be more restrictive whether it has to do with Jordan Lake or not. 82 <br /> 83 <br />Michael Harvey answered that what state law now says is that counties cannot enforce nutrient standards in the Jordan Lake 84 <br />area without expressed permission from the state, and the state has removed all expressed permissions until the study is 85 <br />done. Until the study is done, there cannot be nutrient regulatory standards enforced in the Jordan Lake river basin. 86 <br /> 87 <br />Allison Reinert said that the County still has rules for the Falls and Neuse river basins; those are not being touched in any 88 <br />way. 89 <br /> 90 <br />Randy Marshall asked if the county has a split watershed. 91 <br /> 92 <br />Allison Reinert said yes. 93 <br /> 94 <br />Tony Blake echoed that this only applies to the Jordan Lake Watershed. 95 <br /> 96 <br />Allison Reinert continued going over the proposed amendment for section 6.14.6 in the UDO. This section has been 97 <br />reorganized into 3 sections per recommendation of the County Attorney. The 3 sections are on new development, Falls Lake, 98 <br />and Jordan Lake. There are still nutrient regulations in certain areas of the County, but they cannot be applied unanimously. 99 <br />The section on new development applies to how the department will handle everything, regardless of the watershed. For 100 <br />example, 1(C) regarding the handling of new stormwater systems designed to control the treatment of stormwater runoff 101 <br />generated. This refers to the “10 percent rule,” which is the state standard for quantifying stormwater runoff pre-and-post-102 <br />development; there cannot be more than a 10 percent increase, otherwise there must be a control measure to prevent 103 <br />negative effects to downstream communities and ecosystems. 104 <br /> 105
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.