Browse
Search
ORC minutes 070517
OrangeCountyNC
>
Advisory Boards and Commissions - Active
>
Orange County Planning Board
>
Ordinance Review Committee
>
Minutes
>
2017
>
ORC minutes 070517
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/29/2018 11:51:15 AM
Creation date
8/29/2018 11:51:05 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
BOCC
Meeting Type
Regular Meeting
Document Type
Agenda
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
12
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
<br />8 <br />Committee members talked amongst themselves. 378 <br /> 379 <br />Michael Harvey continued the presentation. The next category for review is Government Services. Planning Staff aims to 380 <br />simplify the uses in the Definitions section (e.g. Government Facilities and Other Buildings (i.e. Administrative, Health 381 <br />Education, etc.), will be listed out in Definitions). 382 <br /> 383 <br />Tony Blake asked that if the Table of Permitted Uses is a blacklist, why not just eliminate these uses. 384 <br /> 385 <br />Michael Harvey answered that currently, Government Facilities and Office Buildings are permitted everywhere along with 386 <br />Government Protective Services. There may be some districts wherein the County Commissioners want to discourage these 387 <br />uses. For example, Government Facilities and Office Buildings are not allowed in Existing Commercial, Existing Industrial, 388 <br />Agricultural Services, and certain Economic Development Districts. 389 <br /> 390 <br />Kim Piracci asked for clarification that these said government facilities only includes county facilities. 391 <br /> 392 <br />Michael Harvey answered that the Table may not be able to refer to county government only as the reference may be 393 <br />inconsistent with the law. This is being reviewed with the County Attorney. 394 <br /> 395 <br />Kim Piracci raised the example of a mini police station in University Mall, a County entity within a non-government facility. 396 <br /> 397 <br />Michael said that the County would not discourage the Sheriff’s office from having a County Sheriff’s substation somewhere. 398 <br /> 399 <br />Kim Piracci asked if there used to be a DMV in the same area. 400 <br /> 401 <br />Michael Harvey confirmed this and added that DMVs are private contractors that get a licensing agreement with the state to 402 <br />run the office. They are independently owned. 403 <br /> 404 <br />Kim Piracci said that DMVs are still a state office with no County jurisdiction. 405 <br /> 406 <br />Michael Harvey acknowledged this point and said that yes, unfortunately state entities are limited - 407 <br /> 408 <br />Tony Blake asked if as state contractors they are limited. 409 <br /> 410 <br />Michael Harvey answered that it does not matter if DMV services are independently provided by a contractor or not; they are 411 <br />an operative with the state of North Carolina until their license is revoked. 412 <br /> 413 <br />Tony Blake said that he was asking this question from a firefighter’s perspective because they are governed under state 414 <br />statutes, not County statute, although their budget is approved by the BOCC. 415 <br /> 416 <br />Randy Marshall asked for confirmation that there are correctional and detention centers in Orange County but that they are 417 <br />located in municipalities. 418 <br /> 419 <br />Michael Harvey confirmed this. There is the jail at the county courthouse and there is the detention center on Highway 86 near 420 <br />the State Employees Credit Union. He believes that the County Attorney’s Office may say that this categorization may not 421 <br />work. They may argue that if you say detention center, you have to allow it in certain sections of the UDO, and you may not 422 <br />have a choice as the state can put a center in no matter what, per eminent domain. Mr. Harvey continued with his 423 <br />presentation. The next category to be discussed is Manufacturing, Assembly, and Processing. The takeaway from this 424 <br />category is that the County Attorney’s office would prefer that we collapse these uses and use definitions for details. The 425 <br />Planning Director and Economic Development Director have identified a need for specificity; as you are marketing property to 426 <br />support development, companies like to see the use specifically listed so that they have some assurance that a land use is 427 <br />permitted. Michael said that he is going to have to figure out a way to make this work, and as Planning Staff makes decisions, 428 <br />they will keep the Committee up to speed on any modifications. 429 <br /> 430
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.